ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023
Predicting Hospital Readmissions in a Commercially Insured Population over Varying Time Horizons.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing temporal windows for wearable-augmented post-discharge risk prediction: a methods study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Patient and Healthcare Provider Priorities for Risk Prediction of Hospital Readmission: A Nominal Group Technique Consensus Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of dual-time-window readmission prediction models under China's medical insurance multi-payment reform.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Evaluating a predictive model of avoidable hospital events for race- and sex-based bias.Health services research · 2025Article
- Incorporating clinical and demographic data into the Elixhauser Comorbidity Model: deriving and validating an enhanced model in a tertiary hospital's internal medicine department.BMC health services research · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReducing hospital readmissions is a federal policy priority, and predictive models of hospital readmissions have proliferated in recent years; however, most such models tend to focus on the 30-day readmission time horizon and do not consider readmission over shorter (or longer) windows.
objectivesTo evaluate the performance of a predictive model of hospital readmissions over three different readmission timeframes in a commercially insured population.
designRetrospective multivariate logistic regression with an 80/20 train/test split.
participantsA total of 2,213,832 commercially insured inpatient admissions from 2016 to 2017 comprising 782,768 unique patients from the Health Care Cost Institute. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes are readmission within 14 days, 15-30 days, and 31-60 days from discharge. Predictor variables span six different domains: index admission, condition history, demographic, utilization history, pharmacy, and environmental controls. KEY
resultsOur model generates C-statistics for holdout samples ranging from 0.618 to 0.915. The model's discriminative power declines with readmission time horizon: discrimination for readmission predictions within 14 days following discharge is higher than for readmissions 15-30 days following discharge, which in turn is higher than predictions 31-60 days following discharge. Additionally, the model's predictive power increases nonlinearly with the inclusion of successive risk factor domains: patient-level measures of utilization and condition history add substantially to the discriminative power of the model, while demographic information, pharmacy utilization, and environmental risk factors add relatively little.
conclusionIt is more difficult to predict distant readmissions than proximal readmissions, and the more information the model uses, the better the predictions. Inclusion of utilization-based risk factors add substantially to the discriminative ability of the model, much more than any other included risk factor domain. Our best-performing models perform well relative to other published readmission prediction models. It is possible that these predictions could have operational utility in targeting readmission prevention interventions among high-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.