Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443626›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

Predicting Hospital Readmissions in a Commercially Insured Population over Varying Time Horizons.

Morgan Henderson, Jon Mark Hirshon, Fei Han, Megan Donohue, Ian Stockwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing temporal windows for wearable-augmented post-discharge risk prediction: a methods study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Morgan HendersonThe Hilltop Institute, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA. mhenderson@hilltop.umbc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0869-5738
Jon Mark HirshonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore St S, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Fei HanThe Hilltop Institute, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.
Megan DonohueDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore St S, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Ian StockwellDepartment of Information Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing hospital readmissions is a federal policy priority, and predictive models of hospital readmissions have proliferated in recent years; however, most such models tend to focus on the 30-day readmission time horizon and do not consider readmission over shorter (or longer) windows.

objectivesTo evaluate the performance of a predictive model of hospital readmissions over three different readmission timeframes in a commercially insured population.

designRetrospective multivariate logistic regression with an 80/20 train/test split.

participantsA total of 2,213,832 commercially insured inpatient admissions from 2016 to 2017 comprising 782,768 unique patients from the Health Care Cost Institute. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes are readmission within 14 days, 15-30 days, and 31-60 days from discharge. Predictor variables span six different domains: index admission, condition history, demographic, utilization history, pharmacy, and environmental controls. KEY

resultsOur model generates C-statistics for holdout samples ranging from 0.618 to 0.915. The model's discriminative power declines with readmission time horizon: discrimination for readmission predictions within 14 days following discharge is higher than for readmissions 15-30 days following discharge, which in turn is higher than predictions 31-60 days following discharge. Additionally, the model's predictive power increases nonlinearly with the inclusion of successive risk factor domains: patient-level measures of utilization and condition history add substantially to the discriminative power of the model, while demographic information, pharmacy utilization, and environmental risk factors add relatively little.

conclusionIt is more difficult to predict distant readmissions than proximal readmissions, and the more information the model uses, the better the predictions. Inclusion of utilization-based risk factors add substantially to the discriminative ability of the model, much more than any other included risk factor domain. Our best-performing models perform well relative to other published readmission prediction models. It is possible that these predictions could have operational utility in targeting readmission prevention interventions among high-risk individuals.

Indexed as

HospitalizationPatient ReadmissionHumansLogistic ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorshospital qualitypredictionreadmission

Identifiers

PMID36443626
PMCPMC10160319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.