Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443610›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2022

Dentate gyrus astrocytes exhibit layer-specific molecular, morphological and physiological features.

Julian Karpf, Petr Unichenko, Nicholas Chalmers, Felix Beyer, Marie-Theres Wittmann, Julia Schneider, Elif Fidan, Andre Reis, Jan Beckervordersandforth, Sebastian Brandner and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cerebellar astrocytic alterations in depression.Translational psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julian KarpfInstitute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Petr UnichenkoInstitute of Cellular Neurosciences, Medical Faculty, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nicholas ChalmersInstitute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Felix BeyerInstitute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3329-0249
Marie-Theres WittmannInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-7572
Julia SchneiderInstitute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Elif FidanInstitute of Neurology (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2877-2067
Andre ReisInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6301-6363
Jan BeckervordersandforthDepartment of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Sebastian BrandnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Stefan LiebnerInstitute of Neurology (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-2258
Sven FalkInstitute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-9274
Andreas SagnerInstitute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-8191
Christian HennebergerInstitute of Cellular Neurosciences, Medical Faculty, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5391-7387
Ruth BeckervordersandforthInstitute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. ruth.beckervordersandforth@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3617-7567
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal heterogeneity has been established as a pillar of higher central nervous system function, but glial heterogeneity and its implications for neural circuit function are poorly understood. Here we show that the adult mouse dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus is populated by molecularly distinct astrocyte subtypes that are associated with distinct DG layers. Astrocytes localized to different DG compartments also exhibit subtype-specific morphologies. Physiologically, astrocytes in upper DG layers form large syncytia, while those in lower DG compartments form smaller networks. Astrocyte subtypes differentially express glutamate transporters, which is associated with different amplitudes of glutamate transporter-mediated currents. Key molecular and morphological features of astrocyte diversity in the mice DG are conserved in humans. This adds another layer of complexity to our understanding of brain network composition and function, which will be crucial for further studies on astrocytes in health and disease.

Indexed as

AstrocytesNeurogliaAdultAnimalsBrainDentate GyrusHippocampusHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID36443610
OpenAlexW4310157868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.