Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443507›Full record

ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2023

Termination of pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Factors influencing the parental decision process.

Emily J J Horn-Oudshoorn, Nina C J Peters, Arie Franx, Alex J Eggink, Suzan C M Cochius-den Otter, Irwin K M Reiss, Philip L J DeKoninck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Organization of care of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia-Building a high-functioning CDH program.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  5. Review of the Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypoplasia as an Important Determinant of Clinical Outcomes in Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily J J Horn-OudshoornDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0582-1129
Nina C J PetersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-7269
Arie FranxDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alex J EgginkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzan C M Cochius-den OtterIntensive Care and Department of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Irwin K M ReissDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Philip L J DeKoninckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4457-0940

Funding

SSWO S19-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the incidence of termination of pregnancies (TOP) and factors associated with the decision for TOP in prenatally detected congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). STUDY

designSingle-centre retrospective cohort includes all prenatally detected CDH cases born between January 2009 and December 2021. Parental factors, such as parity, and fetal characteristics, such as disease severity, were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data. Differences between terminated and continued pregnancies were analysed.

resultsThe study population consisted of 278 prenatally detected CDH cases of which 80% detected <24 weeks of gestation. The TOP rate was 28% in cases that were detected <24 weeks of gestation. Twenty continued pregnancies resulted in either intrauterine fetal demise (n = 6), preterm birth <24 weeks (n = 2), or comfort care after birth (n = 12). The survival rate was 70% in the remaining 195 live born cases. Factors associated with the decision for TOP were additional fetal genetic or anatomical abnormalities (p < 0.0001) and expected severity of pulmonary hypoplasia in left-sided CDH (p = 0.0456).

conclusionThe decision to terminate a pregnancy complicated by fetal CDH depends on the severity of pulmonary hypoplasia and the presence of additional abnormalities. This emphasises the importance of early referral to expertise centres for detailed evaluation and multidisciplinary counselling.

Indexed as

Hernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalPremature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrenatal CarePrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID36443507
PMCPMC10107614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.