Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443391›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Shoot organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from leaf and petiole explants of endangered Euryodendron excelsum.

Yuping Xiong, Shuangyan Chen, Teng Wu, Kunlin Wu, Yuan Li, Xinhua Zhang, Jaime A Teixeira da Silva, Songjun Zeng, Guohua Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genome-wide identification, characterization andFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Chromosome-level genome assembly and demographic history of Euryodendron excelsum in monotypic genus endemic to China.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuping Xiong *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Shuangyan Chen *Institute of Nanfan and Seed Industry, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangdong, 510316, China.
Teng WuGuangzhou Minghui Landscape Technology Development Co, Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Kunlin WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Yuan LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Xinhua ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Jaime A Teixeira da SilvaIndependent Researcher, Ikenobe 3011-2, Miki-cho, Kagawa-ken, 761-0799, Japan.
Songjun ZengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Guohua MaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China. magh@scib.ac.cn.
South China Botanical Garden · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuangdong Academy of Sciences · CNIkenobo Junior College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Euryodendron excelsum H.T. Chang is a rare and endangered woody plant endemic to China. It is very important to conserve and propagate this species from extinction. In this study, leaves and petioles from the axillary shoots in vitro were used as explants to culture on the different plant growth regulator (PGR) woody plant medium (WPM) and establish an efficient shoot proliferation and plant regeneration system. WPM supplemented with 1.0 mg/L 2,4-D induced callus dedifferentiated into buds and somatic embryos on various media,including PGR-free WPM. However, only adventitious shoots formed on WPM with 1.0 mg/L of cytokinins such as 6-benzyladenine (BA), kinetin (KIN) or thidiazuron (TDZ). When another cytokinin, zeatin, was used, somatic embryos were induced directly from From cut surface of these explants. Adventitious roots could be induced from both explants on WPM with 1.0 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). Somatic embryos cultured in PGR-free WPM or WPM with 0.2 mg/L NAA developed roots. Plantlets derived from somatic embryos were transferred to a peat: sand (1:1, v/v) substrate, and showed survival rates of 64.3% at 30 days and 54.6% at 90 days. Callus clumps with adventitious shoot buds that were transferred to WPM containing 1.0 mg/L BA and 0.2 mg/L NAA generated a mean 3.3 multiple shoots. Callus-derived shoots regenerated and rooted successfully (100%) on agar-free vermiculite-based WPM with 0.5 μM NAA after 30 d. Plantlets transplanted to peat soil: vermiculite (1:1, v/v) displayed the highest survival (96.7%) after three months.

Indexed as

EricalesAluminum SilicatesCytokininsEmbryonic DevelopmentNaphthaleneacetic AcidsPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant LeavesRegenerationSoil1-naphthaleneacetic acidAluminum SilicatesCytokininsNaphthaleneacetic AcidsPlant Growth RegulatorsSoilvermiculite

Identifiers

PMID36443391
PMCPMC9705300
OpenAlexW4310154886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.