Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443182›Full record

ArticleClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2023

Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma.

David M Foureau, Barry A Paul, Fei Guo, Edward H Lipford, Kateryna Fesenkova, Elise Tjaden, Kendra Drummond, Manisha Bhutani, Shebli Atrash, Ami Ndiaye and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

David M FoureauImmune Monitoring Core Laboratory, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC. Electronic address: david.foureau@atriumhealth.org.
Barry A PaulDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Fei GuoImmune Monitoring Core Laboratory, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Edward H LipfordDepartment of Hematologic Pathology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Kateryna FesenkovaImmune Monitoring Core Laboratory, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Elise TjadenDepartment of Cancer Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Kendra DrummondDepartment of Cancer Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Manisha BhutaniDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Shebli AtrashDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Ami NdiayeDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Cindy VargaDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Peter M VoorheesDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Saad Z UsmaniMyeloma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: usmanis@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMinimal residual disease (MRD) status is an established prognostic biomarker for patients with multiple myeloma. Commonly used MRD testing techniques such as next generation sequencing or next generation flow cytometry can detect as little as one or two multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10

methodsTo overcome this challenge, we standardized our workflow for collecting specimens by using a technical first pull after needle repositioning for MRD testing. To capture a comprehensive picture of MRD assay performance and specimen adequacy, we tested for MRD on 556 technical first pull bone marrow aspirates by next generation flow cytometry. Among the specimens, several key multiple myeloma treatment milestones were represented: end of induction therapy, two to three months post-autologous stem cell transplant, early and late stages of maintenance therapy.

resultsBy using the technical first pull bone marrow aspirate, we achieved an analytical assay input of 10 million nucleated cells for 97.5% of specimens. Our analytical sensitivity reached 10

conclusionSpecimen adequacy is, therefore, an important metric to incorporate into MRD status reporting.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaBone Marrow CellsFlow CytometryHumansNeoplasm, ResidualWorkflowBone marrow collectionMulticolor cytometry assay performanceMultiple myeloma MRDReporting

Identifiers

PMID36443182
PMCPMC10448729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.