Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443072›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Measuring the Value Functions of Primary Care: Physician-Level Continuity of Care Quality Measure.

Mingliang Dai, Denise Pavletic, Jill C Shuemaker, Craig A Solid, Robert L Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Continuity of care measurement across health systems: UK and US insights for global primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Which methods are most practicable for measuring continuity within general practices?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingliang DaiAmerican Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky mdai@theabfm.org.
Denise PavleticCenter for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, American Board of Family Medicine Foundation, Washington, DC.
Jill C ShuemakerCenter for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, American Board of Family Medicine Foundation, Washington, DC.
Craig A SolidSolid Research Group, LLC, St Paul, Minnesota.
Robert L PhillipsCenter for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, American Board of Family Medicine Foundation, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCare continuity is foundational to the clinician/patient relationship; however, little has been done to operationalize continuity of care (CoC) as a clinical quality measure. The American Board of Family Medicine developed the Primary Care CoC clinical quality measure as part of the Measures That Matter to Primary Care initiative.

methodsUsing 12-month Optum Clinformatics Data Mart claims data, we calculated the Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care Index for each patient, which we rolled up to create an aggregate, physician-level CoC score. The physician quality score is the percent of patients with a Bice-Boxerman Index ≥0.7 (70%). We tested validity in 2 ways. First, we explored the validity of using 0.7 as a threshold for patient CoC within the Optum claims database to validate its use for reflecting patient-level continuity. Second, we explored the validity of the physician CoC measure by examining its association with patient outcomes. We assessed reliability using signal-to-noise methodology.

resultsMean performance on the measure was 27.6%; performance ranged from 0% to 100% (n = 555,213 primary care physicians). Higher levels of CoC were associated with lower levels of care utilization. The measure indicated acceptable levels of validity and reliability.

conclusionsContinuity is associated with desirable health and cost outcomes as well as patient preference. The CoC clinical quality measure meets validity and reliability requirements for implementation in primary care payment and accountability. Care continuity is important and complementary to access to care, and prioritizing this measure could help shift physician and health system behavior to support continuity.

Indexed as

PhysiciansQuality Indicators, Health CareContinuity of Patient CareHumansQuality of Health CareReproducibility of Resultscontinuity of carefamily medicinemeasuresmerit-based incentive payment systemNational Quality ForumqualityQuality Payment Programvalue

Identifiers

PMID36443072
PMCPMC9705031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.