ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2022
[Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting Preeclampsia During Pregnancy].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the changes of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in women with normal pregnancy women and pregnant women with preeclampsia (PE) and the value of using NLR and PLR in the first trimester to predict PE. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 485 pregnant women (97 had PE and 388 were of normal pregnancy) who were admitted to West China Second University Hospital and had their babies delivered there between January 1 and December 31, 2016 and 30 healthy women who were not pregnant and who had physical examination at the hospital over the same period. The subjects' NLR and PLR were calculated and compared. Logistic regression analysis was done to study the risk factors of PE, and the receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the value of using NLR and PLR in the first trimester to predict PE. Results: There was no significant difference in NLR or PLR between the PE group and the normal pregnancy group in the first, second and third trimesters. Compared with that of the normal non-pregnant group, the NLR of the PE group and the normal pregnancy group started to rise in the first trimester, reached the maximum in the second trimester, and decreased in the third trimester; PLR started to decrease in the second trimester and reached the lowest level in the third trimester, exhibiting significant differences ( Conclusion: NLR and PLR are not independent influencing factors of PE and cannot improve the predictive value for PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.