Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443001›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Target Site of Prepulse Inhibition of the Trigeminal Blink Reflex in Humans.

Koji Inui, Yasushi Itoh, Borgil Bayasgalan, Megumi Shingaki, Tomoya Taniguchi, Eishi Motomura, Tetsuo Kida

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The blink reflex and its modulation - Part 1: Physiological mechanisms.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Koji InuiDepartment of Functioning and Disability, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Developmental Disability Center, Kasugai 480-0392, Japan inui@inst-hsc.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-5867-9990
Yasushi ItohDepartment of Functioning and Disability, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Developmental Disability Center, Kasugai 480-0392, Japan.
Borgil BayasgalanDepartment of Functioning and Disability, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Developmental Disability Center, Kasugai 480-0392, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2648-6160
Megumi ShingakiDepartment of Functioning and Disability, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Developmental Disability Center, Kasugai 480-0392, Japan.
Tomoya TaniguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9525-6871
Eishi MotomuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.
Tetsuo KidaDepartment of Functioning and Disability, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Developmental Disability Center, Kasugai 480-0392, Japan.
Aichi Developmental Disability Center · JPMie University · JPNagoya University · JPNational Institute for Physiological Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the clinical significance of prepulse inhibition (PPI), the mechanisms are not well understood. Herein, we present our investigation of PPI in the R1 component of electrically induced blink reflexes. The effect of a prepulse was explored with varying prepulse test intervals (PTIs) of 20-600 ms in 4 females and 12 males. Prepulse-test combinations included the following: stimulation of the supraorbital nerve (SON)-SON [Experiment (Exp) 1], sound-sound (Exp 2), the axon of the facial nerve-SON (Exp 3), sound-SON (Exp 4), and SON-SON with a long trial-trial interval (Exp 5). Results showed that (1) leading weak SON stimulation reduced SON-induced ipsilateral R1 with a maximum effect at a PTI of 140 ms, (2) the sound-sound paradigm resulted in a U-shaped inhibition time course of the auditory startle reflex (ASR) peaking at 140 ms PTI, (3) facial nerve stimulation showed only a weak effect on R1, (4) a weak sound prepulse facilitated R1 but strongly inhibited SON-induced late blink reflexes (LateRs) with a similar U-shaped curve, and (5) LateR in Exp 5 was almost completely absent at PTIs >80 ms. These results indicate that the principal sensory nucleus is responsible for R1 PPI. Inhibition of ASR or LateR occurs at a point in the startle reflex circuit where auditory and somatosensory signals converge. Although the two inhibitions are different in location, their similar time courses suggest similar neural mechanisms. As R1 has a simple circuit and is stable, R1 PPI helps to clarify PPI mechanisms.

Indexed as

BlinkingPrepulse InhibitionAcoustic StimulationFemaleHumansMaleReflex, StartleSoundelectromyographymechanomyographyR1R2R3sensorimotor gating

Identifiers

PMID36443001
PMCPMC9838709
OpenAlexW4310089656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.