Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36442998›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2023

Endoscopic Techniques for Spinal Oncology: A Systematic Literature Review.

Rohaid Ali, Matthew J Hagan, Elias Shaaya, Owen P Leary, Joshua Feler, Ankush Bajaj, Ziya Gokaslan, Sanjay Konakondla, Mark A Mahan, Ralf Wagner and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rohaid AliWarren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Matthew J HaganWarren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Elias ShaayaWarren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Owen P LearyWarren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Joshua FelerWarren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Ankush BajajWarren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Ziya GokaslanWarren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Sanjay KonakondlaGeisinger, 100 North Academy Ave. Danville, PA, USA.
Mark A MahanUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Ralf WagnerLigamenta Spine Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Kai-Uwe LewandrowskiCenter for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona, The Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Albert E TelfeianWarren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA atelfeian@lifespan.org.
Brown University · USCardiovascular Center Frankfurt · DEGeisinger Medical Center · USTucson Orthopaedic Institute · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to its ultraminimally invasive nature, endoscopic spinal surgery is an attractive tool in spinal oncologic care. To date, there has been no comprehensive review of this topic. The authors therefore present a thorough search of the medical literature on endoscopic techniques for spinal oncology.

methodsA systematic review using PubMed was conducted using the following keywords: endoscopic spine surgery, spinal oncology, and spinal tumors.

resultsCollectively, 19 cases described endoscopic spine surgery for spinal oncologic care. Endoscopic spine surgery has been employed for the care of patients with spinal tumors under the following 4 circumstances: (1) to obtain a reliable tissue diagnosis; (2) to serve as an adjunct during traditional open surgery; (3) to achieve targeted debulking; or (4) to perform definitive resection. These cases employing endoscopic techniques highlight the versatility of this approach and its utility when applied to the right patient and with an experienced surgeon.

conclusionsOur systematic review suggests that, given the right patient and an experienced surgeon, endoscopic spine surgery should be considered in the armamentarium for spinal oncologic care for both staging and definitive resection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This systematic literature review showed that endoscopic techniques have been successfully applied across the spectrum of care in spinal oncology, from diagnosis to definitive treatment.

Indexed as

endoscopic decompressionmetastatic lesiononcologic spine care

Identifiers

PMID36442998
PMCPMC10312153
OpenAlexW4310118401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.