Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36442895›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Antepartum and labour-related single predictors of non-participation, dropout and lost to follow up in a randomised controlled trial comparing internet-based cognitive-behaviour therapy with treatment as usual for women with negative birth experiences and/or post-traumatic stress following childbirth.

Josefin Sjömark, Agneta Svanberg, Frida Viirman, Margareta Larsson, Inger Poromaa, Alkistis Skalkidou, Maria Jonsson, Thomas Parling

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josefin SjömarkDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Agneta SvanbergDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Frida ViirmanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Margareta LarssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Inger PoromaaDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Alkistis SkalkidouDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria JonssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Thomas ParlingDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden thomas.parling@kbh.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-6159-598X
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInternet-based interventions are often hampered by high dropout rates. The number of individuals who decline to participate or dropout are reported, but reasons for dropout are not. Identification of barriers to participation and predictors of dropout may help improve the efficacy of internet-based clinical trials. The aim was to investigate a large number of possible predictors for non-participation and dropout in a randomised controlled trial for women with a negative birth experience and/or post-traumatic stress following childbirth.

settingA childbirth clinic at a university hospital in Sweden.

participantsThe sample included 1523 women who gave birth between September 2013 and February 2018. All women who rated an overall negative birth experience on a Likert scale, and/or had an immediate caesarean section (CS), and/or severe postpartum haemorrhage (≥ 2000 mL) were eligible.

methodsDemographic, antepartum, and labour-related/postpartum predictors were investigated for non-participation (eligible but denied participation), pre-treatment dropout (prior to intervention start), treatment dropout, and loss to follow-up. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used in the data analysis.

resultsA majority (80.3 %) were non-participants. Non-participation was predicted by lower level of education, being foreign-born, no experience of counselling for fear of childbirth, multiparity, vaginal delivery (vs CS and vacuum-assisted delivery) and absence of: preeclampsia, anal sphincter injury and intrapartum fetal distress. Pretreatment dropout was predicted by the absence of severe haemorrhage. Treatment dropout was predicted by vaginal delivery (

conclusionsMothers with no obstetric complications were more likely to not participate and dropout at different time points. Both demographic, antepartum and obstetrical variables are important to attend to while designing procedures to maximise participation in internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN39318241.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticCesarean SectionCognitionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFetal DistressHumansInternetLost to Follow-UpParturitionPregnancyadult psychiatryanxiety disordersgynaecologymental healthobstetrics

Identifiers

PMID36442895
PMCPMC9710351
OpenAlexW4310600040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.