Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36442088›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Eye drift during fixation predicts visual acuity.

Ashley M Clark, Janis Intoy, Michele Rucci, Martina Poletti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Spatial and Temporal Factors Influencing Fixational Saccades.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashley M ClarkDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester.
Janis IntoyDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester.ORCID 0000-0002-6024-1661
Michele RucciDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester.ORCID 0000-0002-3066-1964
Martina PolettiDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester.ORCID 0000-0002-4773-8745

Funding

Function of Fixational Instability During Natural ViewingR01EY018363 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI RUCCI, MICHELE · 2007 to 2025
$7.8M
Vision, Attention and Eye Movements at the Scale of the FoveolaR01EY029788 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Martina Poletti · 2019 to 2026
$3.4M
Function of Fixational Eye Movements for Fine Depth PerceptionF31EY029565 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI INTOY, JANIS · 2018 to 2020
$135k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY029565NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018363NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual acuity is commonly assumed to be determined by the eye optics and spatial sampling in the retina. Unlike a camera, however, the eyes are never stationary during the acquisition of visual information; a jittery motion known as ocular drift incessantly displaces stimuli over many photoreceptors. Previous studies have shown that acuity is impaired in the absence of retinal image motion caused by eye drift. However, the relation between individual drift characteristics and acuity remains unknown. Here, we show that a) healthy emmetropes exhibit a large variability in their amount of drift and that b) these differences profoundly affect the structure of spatiotemporal signals to the retina. We further show that c) the spectral distribution of the resulting luminance modulations strongly correlates with individual visual acuity and that d) natural intertrial fluctuations in the amount of drift modulate acuity. As a consequence, in healthy emmetropes, acuity can be predicted from the motor behavior elicited by a simple fixation task, without directly measuring it. These results shed new light on how oculomotor behavior contributes to fine spatial vision.

Indexed as

FaceHistological TechniquesMotionRetinaVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID36442088
PMCPMC9894113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.