Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36442056›Full record

ReviewAnnals of internal medicine2023

Outpatient Treatment of Confirmed COVID-19: A Living, Rapid Review for the American College of Physicians.

Isolde Sommer, Andreea Dobrescu, Dominic Ledinger, Isabel Moser, Kylie Thaler, Emma Persad, Martin Fangmeyer, Robert Emprechtinger, Irma Klerings, Gerald Gartlehner

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isolde SommerCochrane Austria, Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria (I.S., A.D., D.L., I.M., K.T., E.P., M.F., I.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-3592-1507
Andreea DobrescuCochrane Austria, Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria (I.S., A.D., D.L., I.M., K.T., E.P., M.F., I.K.).
Dominic LedingerCochrane Austria, Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria (I.S., A.D., D.L., I.M., K.T., E.P., M.F., I.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-2031-5398
Isabel MoserCochrane Austria, Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria (I.S., A.D., D.L., I.M., K.T., E.P., M.F., I.K.).
Kylie ThalerCochrane Austria, Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria (I.S., A.D., D.L., I.M., K.T., E.P., M.F., I.K.).
Emma PersadCochrane Austria, Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria (I.S., A.D., D.L., I.M., K.T., E.P., M.F., I.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-2719-3685
Martin FangmeyerCochrane Austria, Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria (I.S., A.D., D.L., I.M., K.T., E.P., M.F., I.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-2514-9325
Robert EmprechtingerFaculty of Health and Medicine, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria (R.E.).ORCID 0000-0003-3114-9812
Irma KleringsCochrane Austria, Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria (I.S., A.D., D.L., I.M., K.T., E.P., M.F., I.K.).ORCID 0000-0001-6644-9845
Gerald GartlehnerCochrane Austria, Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems, Austria, and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (G.G.).ORCID 0000-0001-5531-3678
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinicians and patients want to know the benefits and harms of outpatient treatment options for SARS-CoV-2 infection. PURPOSE: To assess the benefits and harms of 12 different COVID-19 treatments in the outpatient setting. DATA SOURCES: Epistemonikos COVID-19 L·OVE Platform, searched on 4 April 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts against a priori-defined criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared COVID-19 treatments in adult outpatients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. DATA EXTRACTION: One reviewer extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence (COE). A second reviewer verified data abstraction and assessments. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 26 included studies collected data before the emergence of the Omicron variant. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and casirivimab-imdevimab probably reduced hospitalizations (1% vs. 6% [1 RCT] and 1% vs. 4% [1 RCT], respectively; moderate COE). Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir probably reduced all-cause mortality (0% vs. 1% [1 RCT]; moderate COE), and regdanvimab probably improved recovery (87% vs. 72% [1 RCT]; moderate COE). Casirivimab-imdevimab reduced time to recovery by a median difference of 4 days (10 vs. 14 median days [1 RCT]; high COE). Molnupiravir may reduce all-cause mortality, sotrovimab may reduce hospitalization, and remdesivir may improve recovery (low COE). Lopinavir-ritonavir and azithromycin may have increased harms, and hydroxychloroquine may result in lower recovery rates (low COE). Other treatments had insufficient evidence or no statistical difference in efficacy and safety versus placebo. LIMITATION: Many outcomes had few events and small samples.

conclusionSome antiviral medications and monoclonal antibodies may improve outcomes for outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19. However, the generalizability of the findings to the currently dominant Omicron variant is limited. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: American College of Physicians. (PROSPERO: CRD42022323440).

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansAdultCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansLactamsLeucineNitrilesOutpatientsProlineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRitonavirSARS-CoV-2LactamsLeucinenirmatrelvirNitrilesProlineRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID36442056
PMCPMC9709728
OpenAlexW4310102500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.