Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36442018›Full record

ArticlePsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2023

Agreement between momentary and retrospective reports of cannabis use and alcohol use: Comparison of ecological momentary assessment and timeline followback indices.

Lindsey K Freeman, Alison M Haney, Sarah A Griffin, Megan N Fleming, Tayler J Vebares, Courtney A Motschman, Timothy J Trull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of event-specific drinking motives reported at the first drink versus retrospectively the next morning.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lindsey K FreemanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-7488-9963
Alison M HaneyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-4593
Sarah A GriffinDepartment of Health Service Psychology and Clinical Psychology, University of Houston Clear Lake.
Megan N FlemingDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Tayler J VebaresDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Courtney A MotschmanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Timothy J TrullDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.

Funding

Psychology of Alcohol Use and Dependence TrainingT32AA013526 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DENIS M MCCARTHY, KENNETH JAMES SHER · 2002 to 2026
$9.0M
A Multi-Method Study of Extreme Alcohol Drinkers in the Lab and in Real-Life: Increasing Precision of Assessments of Extreme Drinking DeterminantsR01AA027824 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI MCCARTHY, DENIS M, SHER, KENNETH JAMES · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
NIAAA NIH HHSNIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA027824NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA013526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study compares three methods of cannabis and of alcohol use assessment in a sample of regular cannabis users: (a) ecological momentary assessment (EMA) repeated momentary surveys aggregated to the daily level, (b) EMA morning reports (MR) where participants reported on their total use from the previous day, and (c) retrospective timeline followback (TLFB) interviews covering the same period of time as the EMA portion of the study. We assessed the overall correspondence between these methods in terms of cannabis and alcohol use occasions and also investigated predictors of agreement between methods.

methodForty-nine individuals aged 18-50 (

resultsDaily aggregated EMA and TLFB reports showed a low to modest agreement for both alcohol and cannabis use. Overall, agreement between EMA and MR was better than agreement between EMA and TLFB, likely because less retrospection is required when only reporting on behavior from the previous day. Quantity and frequency of use differentially predicted agreement across reporting methods when assessing alcohol compared to cannabis. When reporting cannabis use, but not alcohol use, individuals who used more demonstrated higher agreement between EMA and TLFB.

conclusionsResults suggest that retrospective reporting methods assessing alcohol and cannabis should not be considered a direct "substitute" for momentary or daily assessments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

CannabisAlcohol DrinkingEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36442018
PMCPMC10225010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.