Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441797›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Preoperative echocardiography predictive analytics for postinduction hypotension prediction.

Manabu Yoshimura, Hiroko Shiramoto, Mami Koga, Yasuhiro Morimoto

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05969886 (Predictive Value of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling for Post-Induction Hypotension), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05969886 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Predictive Value of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling for Post-Induction Hypotension: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City (UMC)Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled405ConditionsHypotension on Induction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manabu YoshimuraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ube Industries Central Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7729-5084
Hiroko ShiramotoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ube Industries Central Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Mami KogaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ube Industries Central Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yasuhiro MorimotoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ube Industries Central Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHypotension is a risk factor for adverse perioperative outcomes. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography has been extended for preoperative risk assessment before noncardiac surgery. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict postinduction hypotension risk using preoperative echocardiographic data and compared it with conventional statistic models. We also aimed to identify preoperative echocardiographic factors that cause postinduction hypotension.

methodsIn this retrospective observational study, we extracted data from electronic health records of patients aged >18 years who underwent general anesthesia at a single tertiary care center between April 2014 and September 2019. Multiple supervised machine learning classification techniques were used, with postinduction hypotension (mean arterial pressure <55 mmHg from intubation to the start of the procedure) as the primary outcome and 95 transthoracic echocardiography measurements as factors influencing the primary outcome. Based on the mean cross-validation performance, we used 10-fold cross-validation with the training set (70%) to select the optimal hyperparameters and architecture, assessed ten times using a separate test set (30%).

resultsOf 1,956 patients, 670 (34%) had postinduction hypotension. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using the deep neural network was 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.67-0.76), gradient boosting machine was 0.54 (95% CI = 0.51-0.59), linear discriminant analysis was 0.56 (95% CI = 0.51-0.61), and logistic regression was 0.56 (95% CI = 0.51-0.61). Variables of high importance included the ascending aorta diameter, transmitral flow A wave, heart rate, pulmonary venous flow S wave, tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient, inferior vena cava expiratory diameter, fractional shortening, left ventricular mass index, and end-systolic volume.

conclusionWe have created developing models that can predict postinduction hypotension using preoperative echocardiographic data, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of using machine learning models of preoperative echocardiographic data for produce higher accuracy than the conventional model.

Indexed as

HypotensionTricuspid Valve InsufficiencyAnesthesia, GeneralEchocardiographyHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36441797
PMCPMC9704611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.