Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441773›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Indonesian version of the Brief COPE in a sample of advanced cancer patients.

Nurul Huda, Yen-Kuang Lin, Malissa Kay Shaw, Yu-Ying Hsu, Hsiu-Ju Chang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07729696 (Effectiveness of a Digital Psychoeducational Intervention for Young Adults With Fertility Related Distress Following Cancer Diagnosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07729696 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Digital Psychoeducational Intervention for Young Adults With Fertility Related Distress Following Cancer Diagnosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGadjah Mada UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled38ConditionsNeoplasm, Cancer, Psychoeducational Intervention, Young AdultsArmsDigital psychoeducational intervention, control group (standard of care + placebo).
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nurul HudaNursing Faculty, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia.
Yen-Kuang LinGraduate Institute of Athletics and Coaching Science, National Taiwan Sport University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Malissa Kay ShawGraduate Institute of Humanities in Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3994-0302
Yu-Ying HsuSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Ju ChangCollege of Nursing, Department of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8544-0712
Taipei Medical University · TWNational Taiwan Sport University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWRiau University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Brief COPE Inventory has been proven as acceptable psychometric properties to examine coping strategies among cancer patients. However, most psychometric testing studies have been carried out in Western countries, raising concerns about the properties' relevance and applicability in other cultural contexts. This study aimed to present psychometric properties of the Brief COPE in a sample of patients with advanced cancer in Indonesia. Specifically, we intended to examine the factorial structure and the measure's validity and reliability. This study included 440 patients from the original study who completed the Indonesian version of Brief COPE. We used exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to assess factor structure and evaluate the structural model fit, respectively. Reliability was demonstrated by internal consistency represented by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The factor analysis identified a 21-items scale with 5-factors (avoidance, religion and acceptance, social support coping, problem solving and distraction). Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good model fit. For the whole scale and its subscales Cronbach's alpha coefficients were acceptable signifying good reliability. Convergent, divergent validity and contrast group comparison were evidenced by significant correlations among subscales and the other instruments used. This study shows that the Indonesian version of Brief COPE is a reliable and valid instrument to measure coping in advanced cancer patients and is ready for use amongst this population in the Indonesian cultural context.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonNeoplasmsAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansIndonesiaPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36441773
PMCPMC9704551
OpenAlexW4310089682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.