Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441754›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Is image-to-image translation the panacea for multimodal image registration? A comparative study.

Jiahao Lu, Johan Öfverstedt, Joakim Lindblad, Nataša Sladoje

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ContraReg: Contrastive Learning of Multi-modality Unsupervised Deformable Image Registration.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jiahao LuMIDA Group, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1309-5294
Johan ÖfverstedtMIDA Group, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0253-9037
Joakim LindbladMIDA Group, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nataša SladojeMIDA Group, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6041-6310
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

RETROSPECTIVE IMAGE REGISTRATION EVALUATIONR01EB002124 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FITZPATRICK, J MICHAEL · 2003 to 2003
$136k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite current advancement in the field of biomedical image processing, propelled by the deep learning revolution, multimodal image registration, due to its several challenges, is still often performed manually by specialists. The recent success of image-to-image (I2I) translation in computer vision applications and its growing use in biomedical areas provide a tempting possibility of transforming the multimodal registration problem into a, potentially easier, monomodal one. We conduct an empirical study of the applicability of modern I2I translation methods for the task of rigid registration of multimodal biomedical and medical 2D and 3D images. We compare the performance of four Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based I2I translation methods and one contrastive representation learning method, subsequently combined with two representative monomodal registration methods, to judge the effectiveness of modality translation for multimodal image registration. We evaluate these method combinations on four publicly available multimodal (2D and 3D) datasets and compare with the performance of registration achieved by several well-known approaches acting directly on multimodal image data. Our results suggest that, although I2I translation may be helpful when the modalities to register are clearly correlated, registration of modalities which express distinctly different properties of the sample are not well handled by the I2I translation approach. The evaluated representation learning method, which aims to find abstract image-like representations of the information shared between the modalities, manages better, and so does the Mutual Information maximisation approach, acting directly on the original multimodal images. We share our complete experimental setup as open-source (https://github.com/MIDA-group/MultiRegEval), including method implementations, evaluation code, and all datasets, for further reproducing and benchmarking.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingTranslationsEmpirical ResearchImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID36441754
PMCPMC9704666
OpenAlexW4310092560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.