Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441711›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Non-intrusive deep learning-based computational speech metrics with high-accuracy across a wide range of acoustic scenes.

Peter Udo Diehl, Leifur Thorbergsson, Yosef Singer, Vladislav Skripniuk, Annett Pudszuhn, Veit M Hofmann, Elias Sprengel, Paul Meyer-Rachner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter Udo DiehlAudatic, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6683-3011
Leifur ThorbergssonAudatic, Berlin, Germany.
Yosef SingerAudatic, Berlin, Germany.
Vladislav SkripniukAudatic, Berlin, Germany.
Annett PudszuhnCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Veit M HofmannCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7316-2444
Elias SprengelAudatic, Berlin, Germany.
Paul Meyer-RachnerAudatic, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech with high sound quality and little noise is central to many of our communication tools, including calls, video conferencing and hearing aids. While human ratings provide the best measure of sound quality, they are costly and time-intensive to gather, thus computational metrics are typically used instead. Here we present a non-intrusive, deep learning-based metric that takes only a sound sample as an input and returns ratings in three categories: overall quality, noise, and sound quality. This metric is available via a web API and is composed of a deep neural network ensemble with 5 networks that use either ResNet-26 architectures with STFT inputs or fully-connected networks with wav2vec features as inputs. The networks are trained and tested on over 1 million crowd-sourced human sound ratings across the three categories. Correlations of our metric with human ratings exceed or match other state-of-the-art metrics on 51 out of 56 benchmark scenes, while not requiring clean speech reference samples as opposed to metrics that are performing well on the other 5 scenes. The benchmark scenes represent a wide variety of acoustic environments and a large selection of post-processing methods that include classical methods (e.g. Wiener-filtering) and newer deep-learning methods.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSpeechAcousticsHumansSound

Identifiers

PMID36441711
PMCPMC9704549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.