ArticlePloS one2022
Non-intrusive deep learning-based computational speech metrics with high-accuracy across a wide range of acoustic scenes.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain benefits of deep learning-based noise management in experienced hearing aid users using functional near infrared spectroscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Speech and music source separation for cochlear implant users: front-end and end-to-end approach.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Restoring speech intelligibility for hearing aid users with deep learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Objective Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Noise Reduction Algorithm for Hearing Aids Under Diverse Fitting and Listening Conditions.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speech with high sound quality and little noise is central to many of our communication tools, including calls, video conferencing and hearing aids. While human ratings provide the best measure of sound quality, they are costly and time-intensive to gather, thus computational metrics are typically used instead. Here we present a non-intrusive, deep learning-based metric that takes only a sound sample as an input and returns ratings in three categories: overall quality, noise, and sound quality. This metric is available via a web API and is composed of a deep neural network ensemble with 5 networks that use either ResNet-26 architectures with STFT inputs or fully-connected networks with wav2vec features as inputs. The networks are trained and tested on over 1 million crowd-sourced human sound ratings across the three categories. Correlations of our metric with human ratings exceed or match other state-of-the-art metrics on 51 out of 56 benchmark scenes, while not requiring clean speech reference samples as opposed to metrics that are performing well on the other 5 scenes. The benchmark scenes represent a wide variety of acoustic environments and a large selection of post-processing methods that include classical methods (e.g. Wiener-filtering) and newer deep-learning methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.