Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441586›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2022

Determining the Reliable Measurement Period for Preoperative Baseline Values With Telemonitoring Before Major Abdominal Surgery: Pilot Cohort Study.

Marjolein E Haveman, Rianne van Melzen, Mostafa El Moumni, Richte C L Schuurmann, Hermie J Hermens, Monique Tabak, Jean-Paul P M de Vries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marjolein E HavemanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6030-3172
Rianne van MelzenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0919-6532
Mostafa El MoumniDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-7757
Richte C L SchuurmannDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7253-3939
Hermie J HermensDepartment of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-3876
Monique TabakDepartment of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5082-1112
Jean-Paul P M de VriesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2669-320X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative telemonitoring of vital signs, physical activity, and well-being might be able to optimize prehabilitation of the patient's physical and mental condition prior to surgery, support setting alarms during in-hospital monitoring, and allow personalization of the postoperative recovery process.

objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate when and how long patients awaiting major abdominal surgery should be monitored to get reliable preoperative individual baseline values of heart rate (HR), daily step count, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The secondary aim was to describe the perioperative course of these measurements at home.

methodsIn this observational single-center cohort study, patients used a wearable sensor during waking hours and reported PROMs (pain, anxiety, fatigue, nausea) on a tablet twice a day. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the reliability of mean values on 2 specific preoperative days (the first day of telemonitoring and the day before hospital admission) and randomly selected preoperative periods compared to individual reference values. Mean values of HR, step count, and PROMs per day were visualized in a boxplot from 14 days before hospital admission until 30 days after surgery.

resultsA total of 16 patients were included in the data analyses. The ICCs of mean values on the first day of telemonitoring were 0.91 for HR, 0.71 for steps, and at least 0.86 for PROMs. The day before hospital admission showed reliability coefficients of 0.76 for HR, 0.71 for steps, and 0.92-0.99 for PROMs. ICC values of randomly selected measurement periods increased over the continuous period of time from 0.68 to 0.99 for HR and daily step counts. A lower bound of the 95% CI of at least 0.75 was determined after 3 days of measurements. The ICCs of randomly selected PROM measurements were 0.89-0.94. Visualization of mean values per day mainly showed variable preoperative daily step counts (median 2409, IQR 1735-4661 steps/day) and lower postoperative daily step counts (median 884, IQR 474-1605 steps/day). In addition, pain was visually reduced until 30 days after surgery at home.

conclusionsIn this prospective pilot study, for patients awaiting major abdominal surgery, baseline values for HR and daily step count could be measured reliably by a wearable sensor worn for at least 3 consecutive days and PROMs during any preoperative day. No clear conclusions were drawn from the description of the perioperative course by showing mean values of HR, daily step count, and PROM values over time in the home situation.

Indexed as

abdominal surgeryanxietyfatigueheart ratemajor abdominal surgerymajor surgerynauseaobservational studypainpatient-reported outcome measurepreoperativePROMstep countsurgerytelemonitoringvital signswearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID36441586
PMCPMC9745646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.