Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441410›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2023

"Men Rule… this is the Normal Thing. We Normalise it and it's Wrong": Gendered Power in Decision-Making Around Sex and Condom Use in Heterosexual Relationships Amongst Adolescents and Young People in South Africa.

Zoe Duby, Kate Bergh, Kim Jonas, Tarylee Reddy, Brittany Bunce, Chantal Fowler, Catherine Mathews

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. How DoesBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stress-responsive biomarkers and sexual behaviors among young women in rural South Africa.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zoe DubyHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. zoe.duby@mrc.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7615-8152
Kate BerghHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kim JonasHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tarylee ReddyBiostatistics Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Brittany BunceInstitute for Global Sustainable Development (IGSD), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Chantal FowlerDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences in the School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Catherine MathewsHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

NACOSA NACOSA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined power and decision-making in heterosexual relationships amongst South African adolescents and young people. A survey conducted with 515 adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) included items from the Sexual Relationship Power Scale (SRPS) adapted for South African women. Qualitative interviews with fifty AGYW aged between 15 and 24, and nine males aged 18 years and above, explored decision-making in heterosexual relationships, particularly relating to timing of sex and condom use. Theories of gendered power, sexual relationship power and sexual scripting were used in interpreting the data. Findings showed that the power AGYW have in sexual relationships determines their ability to use condoms, and that males generally control condom use and timing of sex. Both survey and interview data suggest that male control over female partners' behaviour also extends beyond the sexual domain. Although while male power is pervasive and enduring, it is simultaneously contested and negotiated. Despite some young people believing that gendered power in decision-making should be equal, it is not always possible for AGYW to enact agency in the dyadic context of heterosexual relationships. Whilst adolescents and young people in South Africa move away from traditional cultural gendered expectations, relationship power inequity and hegemonic masculinities continue to legitimise men's power over women, constraining the sexual agency of adolescent girls and young women and discouraging them from taking control of their own sexual interests and sexual health.

Indexed as

CondomsHIV InfectionsAdolescentFemaleHeterosexualityHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSouth AfricaAdolescents and Young peopleCondom useSexSexual decision-makingSexual Relationship powerSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID36441410
PMCPMC10149448
OpenAlexW4310154897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.