Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441293›Full record

ReviewPsychological research2024

The multisensory nature of human action imagery.

Britta Krüger, Mathias Hegele, Martina Rieger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Britta KrügerNeuromotor Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychology and Sport Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Kugelberg 62, 35394, Giessen, Germany. britta.krueger@sport.uni-giessen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3914-3805
Mathias HegeleNeuromotor Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychology and Sport Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Kugelberg 62, 35394, Giessen, Germany.
Martina RiegerInstitute for Psychology, UMIT Tirol-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imagination can appeal to all our senses and may, therefore, manifest in very different qualities (e.g., visual, tactile, proprioceptive, or kinesthetic). One line of research addresses action imagery that refers to a process by which people imagine the execution of an action without actual body movements. In action imagery, visual and kinesthetic aspects of the imagined action are particularly important. However, other sensory modalities may also play a role. The purpose of the paper will be to address issues that include: (i) the creation of an action image, (ii) how the brain generates images of movements and actions, (iii) the richness and vividness of action images. We will further address possible causes that determine the sensory impression of an action image, like task specificity, instruction and experience. In the end, we will outline open questions and future directions.

Indexed as

ImaginationBrainHumansKinesthesisMovementVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID36441293
PMCPMC11315721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.