SynthesisPediatric surgery international2022
Growth and risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with congenital surgical anomalies: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management of Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR).Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Survival of infants with congenital anomalies requiring surgical correction has increased dramatically, shifting the focus of clinical care and research toward optimising growth and neurodevelopment.To determine the impact of growth on neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants with congenital surgical anomalies. Studies that reported association of growth with developmental outcomes in infants with congenital anomalies who had surgery, were eligible for inclusion. The search strategy was prospectively drafted, and relevant studies were identified by electronic searches. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2022, issue 1), MEDLINE and EMBASE from their earliest date to February 2022 were searched. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Variability in selection of growth measures, developmental assessment tools and assessment endpoints for neurodevelopment, precluded a meta-analysis. Four studies reported the association between growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants with gastroschisis with two noting adverse outcomes in infants who were small for gestational age. Birthweight, reported in four studies, was not associated with adverse developmental outcomes. Postnatal growth, reported in three studies, was associated with adverse outcome. The data linking growth restriction in infants with congenital surgical anomalies and neurodevelopmental outcome is limited. There is limited published research examining the longitudinal effects of intra- and extra-uterine growth parameters on neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36441273What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.