Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441245›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

New technology can benefit established middle ear implant users: Samba 2 vs previous models of audio processors for Vibrant Soundbridge.

Anna Ratuszniak, Artur Lorens, Anita Obrycka, Justyna Witkowska, Henryk Skarzynski, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. The Ponto Bone-Anchored Hearing System - Benefits Following Radical Mastoidectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna RatuszniakOtorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Str., 02-042, Warsaw, Poland. a.ratuszniak@ifps.org.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-0460
Artur LorensImplant and Auditory Perception Department, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Str., 02-042, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8618-7651
Anita ObryckaImplant and Auditory Perception Department, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Str., 02-042, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3053-229X
Justyna WitkowskaImplant and Auditory Perception Department, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Str., 02-042, Warsaw, Poland.
Henryk SkarzynskiOtorhinolaryngosurgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Str., 02-042, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7141-9851
Piotr Henryk SkarzynskiDepartment of Teleaudiology and Hearing Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Str., 02-042, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-1915
Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) is a semi-implantable hearing aid for patients with various types of hearing loss and has been available for over 25 years. Recently, new audio processors with advanced signal processing, noise reduction, and multi-microphone technology have appeared. The aim of this study is to compare the benefits of using the newest Samba 2 processor to the previous generation processors in a group of experienced VSB users.

methodsThere were 22 experienced VSB users (mean time of using VSB was 9 years, SD = 2) who had their processor (D404 or Amadé) upgraded to the newest model (Samba 2). The mean age of the subjects was 56 years (SD = 20). Assessments were made by free-field audiometry, speech reception in quiet and noise, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

resultsHearing tests in free field showed statistically significant improvements in hearing sensitivity and speech discrimination in quiet and noise with the Samba 2 audio processor compared to the earlier technology. PROMs confirmed the benefits of using the newest audio processor and there was more satisfaction in terms of usability.

conclusionsAccess to modern technology for VSB patients provides measurable benefits.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsHearing LossOssicular ProsthesisSpeech PerceptionAudiometryHearingHumansMiddle AgedNoiseAudio processorMiddle ear implantPartial deafnessSemi-implantable hearing aidVibrant Soundbridge

Identifiers

PMID36441245
PMCPMC10066116
OpenAlexW4310249090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.