Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441229›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Individual vs. combined imaging modalities for diagnosing neovascular central serous chorioretinopathy.

Enrico Borrelli, Chiara Viganò, Marco Battista, Riccardo Sacconi, Carlotta Senni, Lea Querques, Domenico Grosso, Francesco Bandello, Giuseppe Querques

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The spectrum of pachychoroid neovasculopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Pachychoroid disease: review and update.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enrico BorrelliVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Chiara ViganòVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Marco BattistaVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo SacconiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Carlotta SenniVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Lea QuerquesVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Domenico GrossoVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BandelloVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe QuerquesVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. giuseppe.querques@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3292-9581
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of individual and combined imaging modalities compared with multimodal imaging for the detection of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

methodsWe analyzed patients with CSC with and without CNV who had indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), structural optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography (OCTA) obtained on the same day. The presence of CNV was determined using multimodal imaging by a senior retina specialist (i.e., diagnostic reference). Individual and combined (i.e., ICGA + structural OCT) imaging modalities were then graded by two expert readers for the presence of CNV. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive values were computed for individual and combined imaging modalities relative to the diagnostic reference.

resultsCNV was detected in 17 eyes in 17 out of 33 CSC patients according to the reference standard. Using ICGA, the identification of CNV had a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 66.7%, PPV of 70.6%, and NPV of 62.5%. Structural OCT had the following diagnostic accuracy values: 83.3% of sensitivity, 53.3% of specificity, 68.1% of PPV, and 72.7% of NPV. Using OCTA, CNV was graded to be present with a sensitivity of 77.8%, specificity of 86.7%, PPV of 87.5%, and NPV of 76.5%. The combination of ICGA and structural OCT granted the identification of CNV with a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 86.7%, PPV of 88.2%, and NPV of 81.3%.

conclusionsOCTA has an elevated diagnostic accuracy in identifying CSC-associated CNV, though a combination of ICGA and structural OCT has a comparable diagnostic efficiency.

Indexed as

Central Serous ChorioretinopathyChoroidal NeovascularizationFluorescein AngiographyHumansIndocyanine GreenRetinaRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceIndocyanine GreenCentral serous chorioretinopathyChoroidal neovascularizationDouble layer signIndocyanine green angiographyMaculaOptical coherence tomographyOptical coherence tomography angiography

Identifiers

PMID36441229
OpenAlexW4310193571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.