Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441228›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Generative adversarial network-based deep learning approach in classification of retinal conditions with optical coherence tomography images.

Ling-Chun Sun, Shu-I Pao, Ke-Hao Huang, Chih-Yuan Wei, Ke-Feng Lin, Ping-Nan Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ling-Chun SunSchool of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-I PaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ke-Hao HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Song-Shan Branch of Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Yuan WeiGraduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ke-Feng LinMedical Informatics Office, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ping-Nan ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Defense Medical Center, No.161, Sec.6, Minchiuan E. Rd., Neihu Dist, Taipei, 11490, Taiwan. g931310@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-4340

Funding

Ministry of National Defense-Medical Affairs Bureau, Taiwan MND-MAB-D-111097Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 108-3111-Y-016-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether a deep learning approach using generative adversarial networks (GANs) is beneficial for the classification of retinal conditions with Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

methodsOur study utilized 84,452 retinal OCT images obtained from a publicly available dataset (Kermany Dataset). Employing GAN, synthetic OCT images are produced to balance classes of retinal disorders. A deep learning classification model is constructed using pretrained deep neural networks (DNNs), and outcomes are evaluated using 2082 images collected from patients who visited the Department of Ophthalmology and the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at the Tri-service General Hospital in Taipei from January 2017 to December 2021.

resultsThe highest classification accuracies accomplished by deep learning machines trained on the unbalanced dataset for its training set, validation set, fivefold cross validation (CV), Kermany test set, and TSGH test set were 97.73%, 96.51%, 97.14%, 99.59%, and 81.03%, respectively. The highest classification accuracies accomplished by deep learning machines trained on the synthesis-balanced dataset for its training set, validation set, fivefold CV, Kermany test set, and TSGH test set were 98.60%, 98.41%, 98.52%, 99.38%, and 84.92%, respectively. In comparing the highest accuracies, deep learning machines trained on the synthesis-balanced dataset outperformed deep learning machines trained on the unbalanced dataset for the training set, validation set, fivefold CV, and TSGH test set.

conclusionsOverall, deep learning machines on a synthesis-balanced dataset demonstrated to be advantageous over deep learning machines trained on an unbalanced dataset for the classification of retinal conditions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRetinal DiseasesAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, Optical CoherenceDeep learningGenerative adversarial networksImbalanceOCTSynthesis-balanced

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.