ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023
Generative adversarial network-based deep learning approach in classification of retinal conditions with optical coherence tomography images.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-dimensional multi-modal foundation model for optical coherence tomography.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- A Low Complexity Efficient Deep Learning Model for Automated Retinal Disease Diagnosis.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- A Future Picture: A Review of Current Generative Adversarial Neural Networks in Vitreoretinal Pathologies and Their Future Potentials.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in ophthalmic optical coherence tomography: a 12-year bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Discriminative, generative artificial intelligence, and foundation models in retina imaging.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether a deep learning approach using generative adversarial networks (GANs) is beneficial for the classification of retinal conditions with Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.
methodsOur study utilized 84,452 retinal OCT images obtained from a publicly available dataset (Kermany Dataset). Employing GAN, synthetic OCT images are produced to balance classes of retinal disorders. A deep learning classification model is constructed using pretrained deep neural networks (DNNs), and outcomes are evaluated using 2082 images collected from patients who visited the Department of Ophthalmology and the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at the Tri-service General Hospital in Taipei from January 2017 to December 2021.
resultsThe highest classification accuracies accomplished by deep learning machines trained on the unbalanced dataset for its training set, validation set, fivefold cross validation (CV), Kermany test set, and TSGH test set were 97.73%, 96.51%, 97.14%, 99.59%, and 81.03%, respectively. The highest classification accuracies accomplished by deep learning machines trained on the synthesis-balanced dataset for its training set, validation set, fivefold CV, Kermany test set, and TSGH test set were 98.60%, 98.41%, 98.52%, 99.38%, and 84.92%, respectively. In comparing the highest accuracies, deep learning machines trained on the synthesis-balanced dataset outperformed deep learning machines trained on the unbalanced dataset for the training set, validation set, fivefold CV, and TSGH test set.
conclusionsOverall, deep learning machines on a synthesis-balanced dataset demonstrated to be advantageous over deep learning machines trained on an unbalanced dataset for the classification of retinal conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36441228What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.