Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441137›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity, and safety of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults: A randomized, double-blind, phase IV trial.

Dandan Zhu, Yuansheng Hu, Zhiwei Jiang, Tuantuan Yang, Kai Chu, Hengming Zhang, Jialei Hu, Xing Meng, Zhijun Tan, Jingliang Wu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dandan ZhuHuaiyin District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huai'an, China.
Yuansheng HuClinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Zhiwei JiangBeijing Key-Tech Statistical Consulting Co, Ltd, Beijing, China.
Tuantuan YangClinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Kai ChuJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institution of Vaccine Clinical Trials, Nanjing, China.
Hengming ZhangClinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Jialei HuJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institution of Vaccine Clinical Trials, Nanjing, China.
Xing MengClinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Zhijun TanBeijing Key-Tech Statistical Consulting Co, Ltd, Beijing, China.
Jingliang WuHuaiyin District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huai'an, China.
Xiaojuan LianSinovac Life Science, Beijing, China.
Changgui LiNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Control of Biological Products, Beijing, China.
Hongxing PanJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institution of Vaccine Clinical Trials, Nanjing, China.
Sinovac Biotech · CNJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous phase I to III clinical trials have shown that the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine namely CoronaVac has good efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. This phase IV trial aims to evaluate the lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity, and safety on a commercial scale in healthy adults, which could provide data to support stable manufacturing. In this single-center, randomized, double-blind study, 1,080 healthy adults aged 26-45 years were randomly assigned into three groups to receive one of three lots of vaccines. All subjects received two doses of CoronaVac with an interval of 28 days. Serum samples were collected before the first dose and 28 days after the second dose to assess the immunogenicity. Solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) within 7 days and unsolicited AEs within 28 days after each dose of vaccination were recorded. A total of 1,039 participants completed the study and were included in the per-protocol set (PPS). The GMTs were 75.2 (68.5,82.6), 65.0 (59.0,71.7), and 65.3 (59.4,71.8), respectively, and the seroconversion rates of neutralizing antibody were all higher than 98%. The GMT ratios of each pair of lots were 1.16 (1.01,1.32), 1.15 (1.01, 1.32), and 0.99 (0.87, 1.14), respectively, meeting the immunological equivalence criteria. The incidence rates of adverse reactions (ARs) were 19.17%, 13.89%, and 18.33%, with no statistical difference. The ARs were all in grade 1 and grade 2, with incidences of 15.46% and 2.50%. Non-vaccine-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. These results showed robust lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity, and safety. The stable production indicated that CoronaVac is suitable for large-scale use.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, InactivatedCoronaVacimmunogenicityLot-to-lot consistencysafetySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36441137
PMCPMC9746504
OpenAlexW4310141816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.