ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Development of an Open-Source Annotated Glaucoma Medication Dataset From Clinical Notes in the Electronic Health Record.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking GPT-5, LLaMA, and Mistral for Clinical Named Entity Recognition in Ophthalmology Progress Notes.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- OphthaBERT: Automated Glaucoma Diagnosis from Clinical Notes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Glaucoma Detection Using Clinical Notes: A Comparative Study of Long Short-Term Memory and Convolutional Neural Network Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Automated Extraction of Key Entities from Non-English Mammography Reports Using Named Entity Recognition with Prompt Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Engineering of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing Models to Accurately Identify Arrhythmia Recurrence.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2025Article
- Guidelines for glaucoma imaging classification, annotation, and quality control for artificial intelligence applications.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- ChatGPT and Beyond: An overview of the growing field of large language models and their use in ophthalmology.Eye (London, England) · 2024Review
- Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition in Ophthalmology Clinical Free-Text Notes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- GRAPE: A multi-modal dataset of longitudinal follow-up visual field and fundus images for glaucoma management.Scientific data · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the methods involved in processing and characteristics of an open dataset of annotated clinical notes from the electronic health record (EHR) annotated for glaucoma medications. Methods: In this study, 480 clinical notes from office visits, medical record numbers (MRNs), visit identification numbers, provider names, and billing codes were extracted for 480 patients seen for glaucoma by a comprehensive or glaucoma ophthalmologist from January 1, 2019, to August 31, 2020. MRNs and all visit data were de-identified using a hash function with salt from the deidentifyr package. All progress notes were annotated for glaucoma medication name, route, frequency, dosage, and drug use using an open-source annotation tool, Doccano. Annotations were saved separately. All protected health information (PHI) in progress notes and annotated files were de-identified using the published de-identifying algorithm Philter. All progress notes and annotations were manually validated by two ophthalmologists to ensure complete de-identification. Results: The final dataset contained 5520 annotated sentences, including those with and without medications, for 480 clinical notes. Manual validation revealed 10 instances of remaining PHI which were manually corrected. Conclusions: Annotated free-text clinical notes can be de-identified for upload as an open dataset. As data availability increases with the adoption of EHRs, free-text open datasets will become increasingly valuable for "big data" research and artificial intelligence development. This dataset is published online and publicly available at https://github.com/jche253/Glaucoma_Med_Dataset. Translational Relevance: This open access medication dataset may be a source of raw data for future research involving big data and artificial intelligence research using free-text.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.