Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36441131›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Development of an Open-Source Annotated Glaucoma Medication Dataset From Clinical Notes in the Electronic Health Record.

Jimmy S Chen, Wei-Chun Lin, Sen Yang, Michael F Chiang, Michelle R Hribar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. OphthaBERT: Automated Glaucoma Diagnosis from Clinical Notes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jimmy S ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Wei-Chun LinDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Sen YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Michael F ChiangNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Michelle R HribarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH INFORMATICST15LM007088 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM R HERSH, Vishnu Mohan · 1992 to 2026
$23.4M
Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TED S ACOTT · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Operationalizing Machine Learning and Discrete Event Simulation Models to Improve Clinic EfficiencyR01LM013426 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HRIBAR, MICHELLE · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
Improving Quality of Electronic Health Record Ophthalmic Data for Big Data AnalyticsR21EY031443 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HRIBAR, MICHELLE · 2020 to 2020
$231k
Improving Quality of Electronic Health Record Ophthalmic Data for Big Data AnalyticsR21LM013937 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WEISKOPF, NICOLE GRAY · 2021 to 2021
$187k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R21 EY031443NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013426NLM NIH HHS R21 LM013937NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the methods involved in processing and characteristics of an open dataset of annotated clinical notes from the electronic health record (EHR) annotated for glaucoma medications. Methods: In this study, 480 clinical notes from office visits, medical record numbers (MRNs), visit identification numbers, provider names, and billing codes were extracted for 480 patients seen for glaucoma by a comprehensive or glaucoma ophthalmologist from January 1, 2019, to August 31, 2020. MRNs and all visit data were de-identified using a hash function with salt from the deidentifyr package. All progress notes were annotated for glaucoma medication name, route, frequency, dosage, and drug use using an open-source annotation tool, Doccano. Annotations were saved separately. All protected health information (PHI) in progress notes and annotated files were de-identified using the published de-identifying algorithm Philter. All progress notes and annotations were manually validated by two ophthalmologists to ensure complete de-identification. Results: The final dataset contained 5520 annotated sentences, including those with and without medications, for 480 clinical notes. Manual validation revealed 10 instances of remaining PHI which were manually corrected. Conclusions: Annotated free-text clinical notes can be de-identified for upload as an open dataset. As data availability increases with the adoption of EHRs, free-text open datasets will become increasingly valuable for "big data" research and artificial intelligence development. This dataset is published online and publicly available at https://github.com/jche253/Glaucoma_Med_Dataset. Translational Relevance: This open access medication dataset may be a source of raw data for future research involving big data and artificial intelligence research using free-text.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsGlaucomaArtificial IntelligenceBig DataHumansRecords

Identifiers

PMID36441131
PMCPMC9710490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.