ReviewRevista de neurologia2022
[Ischaemic or transient attack? Magnetic resonance imaging in transient ischaemic attack: a review of 106 cases].
Review in Revista de neurologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- CSDR Coupling with Exo III for Ultrasensitive Electrochemistry Determination of miR-145.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTransient ischaemic attack (TIA) has classically been defined as an episode of self-limited focal neurological deficit lasting up to 24 hours, with no neuroimaging evidence of established acute ischaemic injury. However, the definition of this entity is changing, and is adapting to new times and new diagnostic techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion sequences. An early and comprehensive approach to TIA, including MRI, is important to rule out clinically recovered established ischaemic strokes, in order to optimise the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients admitted to our stroke unit over a six-month period with suspected TIA were identified, and the definitive diagnosis and approach was studied based on the tests performed.
resultsA sample of 106 suspected cases of TIA were studied, in which early MRI was performed. Of these, 42 (39.62%) were clinically recovered ischaemic strokes (CRIS); 32 (30.18%), other pathologies (six epileptic seizures, five migraine auras, nine functional disorders, two amyloid spells and nine other causes, totalling 31); 26 (24.52%), TIAs; and six (5.66%), haemorrhagic stroke. Of 43 CRIS, eight (18.6%) were cardioembolic; eight (18.6%), atherothrombotic; eight (18.6%), embolic stroke of unknown origin; six (13.95%), lacunar stroke; five (11.62%) of infrequent cause; and four (9.3%), totalling 39, of undetermined cause. CRIS patients received significantly more individualised therapeutic management than TIA patients.
conclusionsThe early use of MRI in the clinical suspicion of TIA makes it possible to gather evidence of CRIS and optimises the diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.