Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440571›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Female cooperative labour networks in hunter-gatherers and horticulturalists.

Thomas S Kraft, Daniel K Cummings, Vivek V Venkataraman, Sarah Alami, Bret Beheim, Paul Hooper, Ed Seabright, Benjamin C Trumble, Jonathan Stieglitz, Hillard Kaplan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond the here and now: hunter-gatherer socio-spatial complexity and the evolution of language.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Female cooperative labour networks in hunter-gatherers and horticulturalists.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Thriving together: the benefits of women's social ties for physical, psychological and relationship health.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Sedentarization and maternal childcare networks: role of risk, gender and demography.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. New perspectives on the evolution of women's cooperation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Shodagor women cooperate across domains of work and childcare to solve an adaptive problem.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thomas S KraftDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0634-9233
Daniel K CummingsDepartment of Health Economics and Anthropology, Economic Science Institute, Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Vivek V VenkataramanDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada T2N 1N4.ORCID 0000-0001-5016-4423
Sarah AlamiSchool of Collective Intelligence, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0001-8081-9638
Bret BeheimMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Paul HooperDepartment of Health Economics and Anthropology, Economic Science Institute, Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Ed SeabrightSchool of Collective Intelligence, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco.
Benjamin C TrumbleSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3201-0628
Jonathan StieglitzInstitute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Université Toulouse 1 Capitole, Toulouse 31000, France.
Hillard KaplanDepartment of Health Economics and Anthropology, Economic Science Institute, Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Karen L EndicottThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Kirk M EndicottDepartment of Anthropology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Michael GurvenDepartment of Anthropology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5661-527X

Funding

Testing Hypothesized Pathways Linking Infection, Physical Activity, Apoe Genotype, And Biological Sex To Low Dementia Prevalence And Reduced Brain Atrophy In Two Native American PopulationsR01AG054442 · NIA · CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY · PI CALEB E FINCH, Margaret Gatz · 2022 to 2026
$15.2M
Brain atrophy, cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's in low CVD-risk populationRF1AG054442 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI FINCH, CALEB E, GURVEN, MICHAEL DOUGLAS · 2017 to 2020
$8.8M
The Human Life Course and the Biodemography of AgingR01AG024119 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI GURVEN, MICHAEL DOUGLAS, KAPLAN, HILLARD S · 2004 to 2015
$7.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG024119NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054442NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG054442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperation in food acquisition is a hallmark of the human species. Given that costs and benefits of cooperation vary among production regimes and work activities, the transition from hunting-and-gathering to agriculture is likely to have reshaped the structure of cooperative subsistence networks. Hunter-gatherers often forage in groups and are generally more interdependent and experience higher short-term food acquisition risk than horticulturalists, suggesting that cooperative labour should be more widespread and frequent for hunter-gatherers. Here we compare female cooperative labour networks of Batek hunter-gatherers of Peninsular Malaysia and Tsimane forager-horticulturalists of Bolivia. We find that Batek foraging results in high daily variation in labour partnerships, facilitating frequent cooperation in diffuse networks comprised of kin and non-kin. By contrast, Tsimane horticulture involves more restricted giving and receiving of labour, confined mostly to spouses and primary or distant kin. Tsimane women also interact with few individuals in the context of hunting/fishing activities and forage mainly with spouses and primary kin. These differences give rise to camp- or village-level networks that are more modular (have more substructure when partitioned) among Tsimane horticulturalists. Our findings suggest that subsistence activities shape the formation and extent of female social networks, particularly with respect to connections with other women and non-kin. We discuss the implications of restricted female labour networks in the context of gender relations, power dynamics and the adoption of farming in humans. This article is part of the theme issue 'Cooperation among women: evolutionary and cross-cultural perspectives'.

Indexed as

HominidaeAgricultureAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsSpousescooperative foragingself-domesticationsocial networksubsistenceTsimane/Batek

Identifiers

PMID36440571
PMCPMC9703235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.