Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440566›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Sedentarization and maternal childcare networks: role of risk, gender and demography.

Abigail E Page, Andrea B Migliano, Mark Dyble, Daniel Major-Smith, Sylvain Viguier, Anushé Hassan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Demography of grandmothering: a case study in Agta foragers.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New perspectives on the evolution of women's cooperation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Sedentarization and maternal childcare networks: role of risk, gender and demography.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Thriving together: the benefits of women's social ties for physical, psychological and relationship health.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Dynamics of cooperative networks associated with gender among South Indian Tamils.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Shodagor women cooperate across domains of work and childcare to solve an adaptive problem.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Wealth, health and inequality in Agta foragers.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Abigail E PageDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-1569
Andrea B MiglianoDepartment of Anthropology, University of Zürich, Zurich 8006, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4364-2735
Mark DybleDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6861-1631
Daniel Major-SmithPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK.
Sylvain ViguierDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Anushé HassanDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3649-3049
University of London · GBGraphcore (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014216/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women cooperate over multiple domains and while research from western contexts portrays women's networks as limited in size and breadth, women receive help, particularly with childcare, from a diverse range of individuals (allomothers). Nonetheless, little exploration has occurred into why we see such diversity. Wide maternal childcare networks may be a consequence of a lack of resource accumulation in mobile hunter-gatherers-where instead households rely on risk-pooling in informal insurance networks. By contrast, when households settle and accumulate resources, they are able to

Indexed as

Child CareGrandparentsChildChild HealthFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleMothersallomotheringgender-rolesgrandmotheringhunter–gatherersrisk-bufferingsedentarization

Identifiers

PMID36440566
PMCPMC9703224
OpenAlexW4310213628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.