Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440533›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2023

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Belgian nursing home residents and staff during the primary COVID-19 vaccination campaign.

Eline Meyers, Liselore De Rop, Ellen Deschepper, Els Duysburgh, Tine De Burghgraeve, Pauline Van Ngoc, Marina Digregorio, Simon Delogne, Anja Coen, Nele De Clercq and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04738695 (SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Among Nursing Home Staff and Residents in Belgium), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04738695 completednot on this map

SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Among Nursing Home Staff and Residents in Belgium

TypeobservationalSponsorSciensanoRan2021 to 2022Enrolled3,008ConditionsCovid19, SARS-CoV-2 InfectionArmsPoint-of-care rapid anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test (Orient Gene Biotech) and Dry Blood Spot collection (Euroimmun)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Eline MeyersDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3549-9548
Liselore De RopDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, EPI-Centre, ACHG, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0111-9508
Ellen DeschepperFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Biostatistics Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Els DuysburghDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3345-7616
Tine De BurghgraeveDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, EPI-Centre, ACHG, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0561-6504
Pauline Van NgocDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Research Unit of Primary Care and Health, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0925-9994
Marina DigregorioDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Research Unit of Primary Care and Health, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5317-7788
Simon DelogneDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Research Unit of Primary Care and Health, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Anja CoenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nele De ClercqDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Laëtitia BuretDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Research Unit of Primary Care and Health, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5653-615X
Samuel CoenenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP) and Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1238-8052
An De SutterDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2540-8307
Beatrice ScholtesDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Research Unit of Primary Care and Health, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5274-822X
Jan Y VerbakelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, EPI-Centre, ACHG, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-7211
Piet CoolsDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2980-5307
Stefan HeytensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-4987
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Liège · BESciensano (Belgium) · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing home residents (NHR) and staff have been disproportionally affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and were therefore prioritised in the COVID-19 vaccination strategy. However, frail older adults, like NHR, are known to have decreased antibody responses upon vaccination targeting other viral antigens.

objectivesAs real-world data on vaccine responsiveness, we assessed the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Belgian NHR and staff during the primary COVID-19 vaccination campaign.

methodsIn total, we tested 1629 NHR and 1356 staff across 69 Belgian NHs for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibodies using rapid tests. We collected socio-demographic and COVID-19-related medical data through questionnaires. Sampling occurred between 1 February and 24 March 2021, in a randomly sampled population that received none, one or two BNT162b2 vaccine doses.

resultsWe found that during the primary vaccination campaign with 59% of the study population fully vaccinated, 74% had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Among fully vaccinated individuals only, fewer residents tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (77%) than staff (98%), suggesting an impaired vaccine-induced antibody response in the elderly, with lowest seroprevalences observed among infection naïve residents. COVID-19 vaccination status and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were predictors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. Alternatively, age ≥ 80 years old, the presence of comorbidities and high care dependency predicted SARS-CoV-2 seronegativity in NHR.

conclusionThese findings highlight the need for further monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 immunity upon vaccination in the elderly population, as their impaired humoral responses could imply insufficient protection against COVID-19.

trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04738695).

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImmunization ProgramsNursing HomesPandemicsPrevalenceProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinationnursing home residentsnursing homesSARS-CoV-2 seroprevalencevaccination campaign

Identifiers

PMID36440533
PMCPMC10249443
OpenAlexW4310215212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.