Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440449›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

The BioExperience Research and Entrepreneurship Challenge: An iGEM-inspired applied research program for BIOSTEM talent and skills development.

Hertek Gill, Mahdi Ahsan, Yara Khalil, Victoria Feng, Jessie Pearce, Tarasha Sharma, Mohamad Radwan, Austin Boucinha, Mads Kærn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hertek GillOttawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mahdi AhsanOttawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Yara KhalilOttawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Victoria FengOttawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jessie PearceOttawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Tarasha SharmaOttawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mohamad RadwanOttawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Austin BoucinhaCanadian Synthetic Biology Educational Research Group (CSBERG), Centre for Applied Bioscience and Bioengineering Research (BioZone), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mads KærnOttawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-secondary education is falling behind in delivering the talent and skills development needed to support the growth of biology-based economies and the demands of professional and research-based graduate degree programs. Here, we describe an applied research program, the BioExperience Research and Entrepreneurship Challenge, launched in May 2020 to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on undergraduate experiential learning programs at the University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. The program provided undergraduates with meaningful talent and skills development opportunities by implementing a student-centred, project-based learning approach inspired by the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition. We present evidence from participant exit surveys suggesting that the program delivers a high-quality learning environment and improves learning outcomes compared to traditional work-integrated learning. Notably, 84% of respondents reported an excellent or exceptional learning experience and significant or profound improvements in skills, such as leadership (72% of respondents), problem-solving (42% of respondents) and research preparedness (52%) that are difficult to develop in conventional academic programs. Remarkably, 60% of respondents report that the job-readiness training provided by the program is better or much better than traditional work-integrated learning. Our study demonstrates that a cost-effective and scalable alternative to the iGEM competition can improve talent and skills development in BIOSTEM fields.

Indexed as

engineered and synthetic biologyexperiential and work-integrated learningskills developmenttalentundergraduate applied research

Identifiers

PMID36440449
PMCPMC9685995
OpenAlexW4308875491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.