Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440445›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview.

Mohsen Yazdanian, Mostafa Alam, Kamyar Abbasi, Mahdi Rahbar, Amin Farjood, Elahe Tahmasebi, Hamid Tebyaniyan, Reza Ranjbar, Arian Hesam Arefi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The current techniques in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty: a comprehensive review.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The effect of green synthesis of TiOVeterinary medicine and science · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohsen YazdanianResearch Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mostafa AlamDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kamyar AbbasiDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi RahbarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Amin FarjoodOrthodontic Department, Dental School, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Elahe TahmasebiResearch Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid TebyaniyanDepartment of Science and Research, Islimic Azade University, Tehran, Iran.
Reza RanjbarResearch Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arian Hesam ArefiDental Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The state-of-the-art approach to regenerating different tissues and organs is tissue engineering which includes the three parts of stem cells (SCs), scaffolds, and growth factors. Cellular behaviors such as propagation, differentiation, and assembling the extracellular matrix (ECM) are influenced by the cell's microenvironment. Imitating the cell's natural environment, such as scaffolds, is vital to create appropriate tissue. Craniofacial tissue engineering refers to regenerating tissues found in the brain and the face parts such as bone, muscle, and artery. More biocompatible and biodegradable scaffolds are more commensurate with tissue remodeling and more appropriate for cell culture, signaling, and adhesion. Synthetic materials play significant roles and have become more prevalent in medical applications. They have also been used in different forms for producing a microenvironment as ECM for cells. Synthetic scaffolds may be comprised of polymers, bioceramics, or hybrids of natural/synthetic materials. Synthetic scaffolds have produced ECM-like materials that can properly mimic and regulate the tissue microenvironment's physical, mechanical, chemical, and biological properties, manage adherence of biomolecules and adjust the material's degradability. The present review article is focused on synthetic materials used in craniofacial tissue engineering in recent decades.

Indexed as

biocompatible materialscraniofacial regenerationdentalsynthetic materialstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36440445
PMCPMC9681815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.