Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440369›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of data science and analytics2022

Learning to discover medicines.

Minh-Tri Nguyen, Thin Nguyen, Truyen Tran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of data science and analytics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minh-Tri NguyenApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC Australia.
Thin NguyenApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC Australia.
Truyen TranApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering new medicines is the hallmark of the human endeavor to live a better and longer life. Yet the pace of discovery has slowed down as we need to venture into more wildly unexplored biomedical space to find one that matches today's high standard. Modern AI-enabled by powerful computing, large biomedical databases, and breakthroughs in deep learning offers a new hope to break this loop as AI is rapidly maturing, ready to make a huge impact in the area. In this paper, we review recent advances in AI methodologies that aim to crack this challenge. We organize the vast and rapidly growing literature on AI for drug discovery into three relatively stable sub-areas: (a)

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBiomedical representation learningDrug discoveryDrug discovery reasoningMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36440369
PMCPMC9676887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.