Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440342›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

The conservative treatment of congenital scoliosis with hemivertebra: Report of three cases.

Matteo Caredda, Diletta Bandinelli, Francesco Falciglia, Marco Giordano, Angelo Gabriele Aulisa

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital scoliosis.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  4. Fetal Scoliosis: Natural History and Outcomes.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo CareddaDepartment of Aging, Neurological, Orthopedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Diletta BandinelliDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Francesco FalcigliaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Marco GiordanoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Angelo Gabriele AulisaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Scoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination thereof. Complete failure of formation causes hemivertebra which can lead to unbalanced growth and deformation. Statistically, 25% of congenital curves do not evolve, 25% progress slightly, while the remaining 50% develop quickly and require treatment. Hemivertebrae can be divided into three types: non-segmented, semi-segmented, and fully-segmented. The fully-segmented types are most likely to progress. Hemivertebra in the thoracolumbar region shows higher rates of progression compared with those in the lumbar area. The treatment may be either conservative or surgical. In general, bracing is not recommended in short and rigid curves, although it may help process secondary curves. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of bracing in congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra. Cases presentation: Searching in our database, we found three cases of patients with congenital scoliosis due to fully-segmented hemivertebra. The first of them was 6 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L5, determining an L1-L5 (S1) lumbar curve. The second one was 10 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L2 and a T11-L4 (L5 sacralized) thoracolumbar curve. The last one was 3 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L3 (in six lumbar bodies), determining a thoracolumbar curve T12-L4. Results: We utilized a Milwaukee brace for the first patient, a Boston brace for the second patient, and a Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) for the third patient. At the beginning of the treatment, the Cobb angles measured 23°, 53°, and 25°, respectively. During treatment, the Cobb angles measured 22°, 35°, and 15°, respectively. At the end of treatment, the Cobb angles measured 18°, 45°, and 12°, respectively. At long-term follow-up, the curves measured 20°, 45°, and 12° Cobb angles, respectively. Conclusions: Comparing our cases with those found in the literature we can confirm the ability of conservative treatment to change the natural history of congenital lumbar scoliosis due to failure of formation. From our experience, in all cases of CS with hemivertebra, before considering a surgical approach, conservative treatment should be implemented as early as possible without waiting for the progressive deformation of the adjacent normal vertebrae.

Indexed as

bracingcongenital scoliosis (CS)conservative treatment (CT)failure of formationhemivertebra

Identifiers

PMID36440342
PMCPMC9682117
OpenAlexW4308720168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.