Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440280›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Braille letter reading: A benchmark for spatio-temporal pattern recognition on neuromorphic hardware.

Simon F Müller-Cleve, Vittorio Fra, Lyes Khacef, Alejandro Pequeño-Zurro, Daniel Klepatsch, Evelina Forno, Diego G Ivanovich, Shavika Rastogi, Gianvito Urgese, Friedemann Zenke and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Simon F Müller-CleveIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Event-Driven Perception in Robotics, Genoa, Italy.
Vittorio FraPolitecnico di Torino, Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Group, Torino, Italy.
Lyes KhacefBio-Inspired Circuits and Systems Lab, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Groningen Cognitive Systems and Materials Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Alejandro Pequeño-ZurroLaboratory of Neural Computation, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Daniel KlepatschSilicon Austria Labs, Johannes Kepler Universität (JKU) Linz Institute of Technology (LIT) Silicon Austria Labs (SAL) embedded Signal Processing and Machine Learning (eSPML) Lab, Graz, Austria.
Evelina FornoPolitecnico di Torino, Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Group, Torino, Italy.
Diego G IvanovichSilicon Austria Labs, Johannes Kepler Universität (JKU) Linz Institute of Technology (LIT) Silicon Austria Labs (SAL) embedded Signal Processing and Machine Learning (eSPML) Lab, Graz, Austria.
Shavika RastogiInternational Centre for Neuromorphic Systems, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Gianvito UrgesePolitecnico di Torino, Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Group, Torino, Italy.
Friedemann ZenkeFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Chiara BartolozziIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Event-Driven Perception in Robotics, Genoa, Italy.
Italian Institute of Technology · ITPolytechnic University of Turin · ITSilicon Austria Labs (Austria) · ATFriedrich Miescher Institute · CHUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatio-temporal pattern recognition is a fundamental ability of the brain which is required for numerous real-world activities. Recent deep learning approaches have reached outstanding accuracies in such tasks, but their implementation on conventional embedded solutions is still very computationally and energy expensive. Tactile sensing in robotic applications is a representative example where real-time processing and energy efficiency are required. Following a brain-inspired computing approach, we propose a new benchmark for spatio-temporal tactile pattern recognition at the edge through Braille letter reading. We recorded a new Braille letters dataset based on the capacitive tactile sensors of the iCub robot's fingertip. We then investigated the importance of spatial and temporal information as well as the impact of event-based encoding on spike-based computation. Afterward, we trained and compared feedforward and recurrent Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) offline using Backpropagation Through Time (BPTT) with surrogate gradients, then we deployed them on the Intel Loihi neuromorphic chip for fast and efficient inference. We compared our approach to standard classifiers, in particular to the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) deployed on the embedded NVIDIA Jetson GPU, in terms of classification accuracy, power, and energy consumption together with computational delay. Our results show that the LSTM reaches ~97% of accuracy, outperforming the recurrent SNN by ~17% when using continuous frame-based data instead of event-based inputs. However, the recurrent SNN on Loihi with event-based inputs is ~500 times more energy-efficient than the LSTM on Jetson, requiring a total power of only ~30 mW. This work proposes a new benchmark for tactile sensing and highlights the challenges and opportunities of event-based encoding, neuromorphic hardware, and spike-based computing for spatio-temporal pattern recognition at the edge.

Indexed as

benchmarkingBraille readingevent-based encodingneuromorphic hardwarespatio-temporal pattern recognitionspiking neural networkstactile sensing

Identifiers

PMID36440280
PMCPMC9695069
OpenAlexW4308937689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.