To shift or to rotate? Comparison of acquisition strategies for multi-slice super-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Multi-slice (MS) super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) methods have been proposed to improve the trade-off between resolution, signal-to-noise ratio and scan time in magnetic resonance imaging. MS-SRR consists in the estimation of an isotropic high-resolution image from a series of anisotropic MS images with a low through-plane resolution, where the anisotropic low-resolution images can be acquired according to different acquisition schemes. However, it is yet unclear how these schemes compare in terms of statistical performance criteria, especially for regularized MS-SRR. In this work, the estimation performance of two commonly adopted MS-SRR acquisition schemes based on shifted and rotated MS images respectively are evaluated in a Bayesian framework. The maximum a posteriori estimator, which introduces regularization by incorporating prior knowledge in a statistically well-defined way, is put forward as the estimator of choice and its accuracy, precision, and Bayesian mean squared error (BMSE) are used as performance criteria. Analytic calculations as well as Monte Carlo simulation experiments show that the rotated scheme outperforms the shifted scheme in terms of precision, accuracy, and BMSE. Furthermore, the superior performance of the rotated scheme is confirmed in real data experiments and in retrospective simulation experiments with and without inter-image motion. Results show that the rotated scheme allows regularized MS-SRR with a higher accuracy and precision than the shifted scheme, besides being more resilient to motion.