ArticleACS omega2022
Non-invasive Exhaled Breath and Skin Analysis to Diagnose Lung Cancer: Study of Age Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring Components, Sensors, and Techniques for Cancer Detection via eNose Technology: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Identifying novel biomarkers for biliary tract cancer based on volatile organic compounds analysis and machine learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Collection methods of exhaled volatile organic compounds for lung cancer screening and diagnosis: a systematic review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Through Exhaled Breath: A Comprehensive Study.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- The human volatilome meets cancer diagnostics: past, present, and future of noninvasive applications.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024Review
- Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of simple, fast, and non-invasive tests for lung cancer diagnostics is essential for clinical practice. In this paper, exhaled breath and skin were studied as potential objects to diagnose lung cancer. The influence of age on the performance of diagnostic models was studied. Gas chromatography in combination with mass spectrometry (MS) was used to analyze the exhaled breath of 110 lung cancer patients and 212 healthy individuals of various ages. Peak area ratios of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were used for data analysis instead of VOC peak areas. Various machine learning algorithms were applied to create diagnostic models, and their performance was compared. The best results on the test data set were achieved using artificial neural networks (ANNs): classification of patients with lung cancer and young healthy volunteers: 88 ± 4% sensitivity and 83 ± 3% specificity; classification of patients with lung cancer and old healthy individuals: 81 ± 3% sensitivity and 85 ± 1% specificity. The difference between performance of models based on young and old healthy groups was minor. The results obtained have shown that metabolic dysregulation driven by the disease biology is too high, which significantly overlaps the age effect. The influence of tumor localization and histological type on exhaled breath samples of lung cancer patients was studied. Statistically significant differences between some parameters in these samples were observed. A possibility of assessing the disease status by skin analysis in the Zakharyin-Ged zones using an electronic nose based on the quartz crystal microbalance sensor system was evaluated. Diagnostic models created using ANNs allow us to classify the skin composition of patients with lung cancer and healthy subjects of different ages with a sensitivity of 69 ± 2% and a specificity of 68 ± 8% for the young healthy group and a sensitivity of 74 ± 7% and a specificity of 66 ± 6% for the old healthy group. Primary results of skin analysis in the Zakharyin-Ged zones for the lung cancer diagnosis have shown its utility, but further investigation is required to confirm the results obtained.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.