Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440051›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Kurt Bjorkman, Jennifer R Maldonado, Stephanie Saey, Daniel McLennan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kurt BjorkmanRoy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Jennifer R MaldonadoMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Stephanie SaeyRoy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Daniel McLennanMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Medical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the mechanical performance of the Lifetech IBS Angel stents during overdilation as is often required in pediatric applications; including time of first fracture, foreshortening, and the type of fracturing that occurs. Materials and methods: Results: A total of 47 stents on monorail system were overdilated to complete fracture after passing through either a 4 or 5 French sheath. First strut fracture occurred in 4 and 6 mm stents when they reached greater than 50% overexpansion. Larger stents could achieve at least 30% increased diameter prior to first strut fracture. No fragmentation of any of the stents was seen throughout testing. Conclusion: The IBS Angel has thin struts allowing for a lower profile with increased maneuverability and use with smaller sheaths. Embolization potential of strut fragments was not seen. Increased diameter well beyond design parameters was seen in all with acceptable foreshortening.

Indexed as

bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS)congenital heart diseaseforeshorteningstentstress testing device

Identifiers

PMID36440051
PMCPMC9682241
OpenAlexW4308723720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.