SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the association of albuminuria with the incidence of preeclampsia and its predictive capabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Association of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with offspring cardiometabolic indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Does Adherence Modify Low-Dose Aspirin Effects in Pregnancy? Post Hoc Analysis From a Multi-Centre Trial.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Trial
- Contributions of preeclampsia to preterm delivery: a hypothetical interventional cohort study using incremental propensity scores.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- SERPINA3 and NDRG1 are critical diagnostic immune genes associated with macrophages in preeclampsia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- LEARNER - A prospective, randomized controlled study to evaluate the effects of daily low dose aspirin in pregnant women with sickle cell disease when initiated at the first trimester versus the second trimester of the gestational period - study protocol.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Inflammation at the Maternal-Fetal Interface: Mechanisms Linking Maternal-Fetal Immunity to Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Correlations Between Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A Levels and Pregnancy Characteristics, Placental Volume, Vascularization, and Histopathology.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Article
- Impact of Dietary Salicylates on Iron, Zinc, and Copper Status in Preeclampsia Model Rats Induced by L-NAME.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- The impact of obesity on pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes across the NSW population: A retrospective cohort study.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
- Association betweenFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with early-onset preeclampsia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- PRESHA - Preventing severe hypertensive adverse events in pregnancy and childbirth: a study protocol for establishing a prospective cohort study and biobank in urban Tanzania.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Serum biomarkers for the prediction and diagnosis of preeclampsia: a systematic meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Acetylsalicylic acid modulates progression of endogenous thrombin potential in high-risk pregnancies.PloS one · 2026Article
- Review
- Placental growth factor before 11 weeks for screening of preterm preeclampsia: The PreMoM study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Kidney health outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Increased platelet activation and thrombo-inflammation in early and late-onset preeclampsia.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Preeclampsia Treatment Aspirin/Clampsilin: Oxidative Stress, sFlt-1/PIGF Soluble Tyrosine Kinase 1, and Placental Growth Factor Monitoring.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The results of randomized controlled studies on aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia (PE) are conflicting, and some of the related meta-analyses also have limitations or flaws. Data sources: A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, with no time or language restrictions. Study eligibility criteria: Randomized controlled studies comparing aspirin for the prevention of PE were conducted. Methods: Systematic reviews were performed according to the Cochrane Manual guidelines. A fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was chosen to calculate pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals based on the heterogeneity of the included studies. The study aimed to investigate the effect of aspirin on the development of PE in high-risk and general populations of women. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. All included studies were assessed for bias by the Cochrane Manual of Bias Assessment. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the aspirin dose, time of initial aspirin intervention, and the region in which the research was conducted, to explore the effective dose of aspirin and time of initial aspirin intervention and to try to find sources of heterogeneity and publication bias. Results: A total of 39 articles were included, including 29 studies involving pregnant women at high risk for PE (20,133 patients) and 10 studies involving a general population of pregnant women (18,911 patients). Aspirin reduced the incidence of PE by 28% (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.83) in women at high risk for PE. Aspirin reduced the incidence of PE by 30% in the general population (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95), but sensitivity analyses found that aspirin in the general population was not robust. A subgroup analysis showed that an aspirin dose of 75 mg/day (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.78) had a better protective effect than other doses. Starting aspirin at 12-16 weeks (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.74) of gestation or 17-28 weeks (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.89) reduced the incidence of PE by 38% in women at high risk for PE, but the results were more reliable for use at 12-16 weeks. Heterogeneity and publication bias of the included studies may be mainly due to the studies completed in Asia. Conclusion: Aspirin is recommended to be started at 12-16 weeks of pregnancy in women at high risk for PE. The optimal dose of aspirin to use is 75 mg/d. Systematic review registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [CRD42022319984].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.