Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440040›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Longitudinal trends in blood pressure, prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the Czech population. Are there any sex differences?

Renata Cífková, Jan Bruthans, Larysa Strilchuk, Peter Wohlfahrt, Alena Krajčoviechová, Pavel Šulc, Marie Jozífová, Lenka Eremiášová, Jan Pudil, Aleš Linhart and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Revisiting sex as a biological variable in hypertension research.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial: Women in hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Renata CífkováCenter for Cardiovascular Prevention, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Jan BruthansCenter for Cardiovascular Prevention, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Larysa StrilchukCenter for Cardiovascular Prevention, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Peter WohlfahrtCenter for Cardiovascular Prevention, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Alena KrajčoviechováCenter for Cardiovascular Prevention, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Pavel ŠulcCenter for Cardiovascular Prevention, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Marie JozífováCenter for Cardiovascular Prevention, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Lenka EremiášováDepartment of Medicine II, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Jan PudilDepartment of Medicine II, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Aleš LinhartDepartment of Medicine II, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Jiří WidimskýDepartment of Medicine III, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Jan FilipovskýDepartment of Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Otto MayerDepartment of Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Zdenka ŠkodováDepartment of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Věra LánskáMedical Statistics Unit, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Charles University · CZThomayer University Hospital · CZInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular disease which substantially increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite the broad availability of antihypertensive medication, control of hypertension is not satisfactory worldwide. Objective: The study aim was to assess longitudinal trends in blood pressure, prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in a representative population sample of the Czechia from 1985 to 2016/2017, focusing on sex differences. Methods: A total of 7,606 men and 8,050 women aged 25-64 years were screened for major CV risk factors in seven independent cross-sectional surveys run consistently in the same six country districts of the Czechia between 1985 and 2016/2017. The population samples were randomly selected. Results: Over a study period of 31/32 years, there was a significant decline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in both sexes, whereas the prevalence of hypertension decreased only in women. There was an increase in hypertension awareness in both sexes over the entire study period with consistently higher rates in women. The proportion of individuals treated with antihypertensive drugs increased significantly in both sexes throughout the study, again with consistently higher rates in women. Control of hypertension increased significantly over the study period with consistently higher rates in women. The age-adjusted trends in blood pressure, prevalence, awareness, and treatment of hypertension were significantly different in men and women, always in favor of women. The age-adjusted trends in control of hypertension in treated patients were equally poor in both sexes. Conclusion: There are significant differences in longitudinal trends in blood pressure, prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension between men and women, always in favor of women except for the control of hypertension in treated patients, where it is equally poor in both sexes.

Indexed as

Czech MONICACzech post-MONICA studyepidemiology of hypertensionpopulation random sampleresponse rate

Identifiers

PMID36440040
PMCPMC9686845
OpenAlexW4308875521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.