Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440021›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Clinical and economic impact of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention in young individuals with acute coronary syndromes and multivessel disease: A real-world comparison in a middle-income country.

Gustavo de Almeida Alexim, Luiza Ferreira Rocha, Giovani Prediger Dobri, Adair da Silva Rosa Júnior, Ricardo Torres Bispo Reis, Ana Claudia Cavalcante Nogueira, Alexandre Anderson de Souza Munhoz Soares, Andrei Carvalho Sposito, Ana Patricia de Paula, Luiz Sérgio Fernandes de Carvalho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cardiovascular Statistics - Brazil 2023.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gustavo de Almeida AleximMedical Sciences Post-Graduation Program, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Luiza Ferreira RochaSecretaria de Estado de Saúde do Distrito Federal (SES-DF), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Giovani Prediger DobriSecretaria de Estado de Saúde do Distrito Federal (SES-DF), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Adair da Silva Rosa JúniorSecretaria de Estado de Saúde do Distrito Federal (SES-DF), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Ricardo Torres Bispo ReisDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Ana Claudia Cavalcante NogueiraMedical Sciences Post-Graduation Program, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Alexandre Anderson de Souza Munhoz SoaresAramari Apo Institute, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Andrei Carvalho SpositoAramari Apo Institute, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Ana Patricia de PaulaMedical Sciences Post-Graduation Program, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Luiz Sérgio Fernandes de CarvalhoMedical Sciences Post-Graduation Program, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde · BRSecretaria de Estado de Educação do Distrito Federal · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent decades, the world watched a dramatic increase in the incidence of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) among young individuals (≤55 years-old) and a relative decrease in the elderly. The management of ACS in young patients with multivessel disease still needs to be elucidated, as these individuals maintain a long life expectancy. Research Question: To compare clinical outcomes and care costs in individuals with premature ACS and multivessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results: Participants included all individuals ≤55 years-old admitted with ACS to public hospitals in Brasília (Brazil) between 2013 and 2015 and who underwent cardiac catheterization with SYNTAX score ≥23 or Duke category 6. Outcomes were adjudicated with death certificates and data from medical records. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death due to cardiovascular causes, recurrent hospitalizations due to cardiovascular ischemic events, and incident heart failure New York Heart Association III-IV. As secondary outcome we assessed indirect and direct costs by evaluating the cost of lost productivity (in international dollars (Int$) per year) due to illness and death, outpatient costs and costs with new hospitalizations. Multivariate and principal components (PC) adjusted analyzes were performed. Results: Among 1,088 subjects (111 CABG and 977 PCI) followed for 6.2 years (IQR: 1.1), 304 primary events were observed. MACE was observed in 20.7% of the CABG group and 28.8% of the PCI group ( Conclusions: Among young individuals with ACS and multivessel disease, surgical strategy was associated with a lower occurrence of MACE and lower indirect costs in the long-term.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromes (ACS)coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)costsindirect cost estimationoutcomes assessmentpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Identifiers

PMID36440021
PMCPMC9685999
OpenAlexW4308872822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.