Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36439866›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2022

CRISPR nuclease off-target activity and mitigation strategies.

Beeke Wienert, M Kyle Cromer

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Role of CRISPR and Its Therapeutic Applications in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Off-target detection of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleaseSynthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Clinical hematopoietic stem cell-based gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. LSINCT5: a pivotal oncogenic long non-coding RNA in cancers.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Gene editing of CD3 epsilon to redirect regulatory T cells for adoptive T cell transfer.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beeke WienertGraphite Bio, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States.
M Kyle CromerDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Broad Center · US

Funding

Homologous Recombination Mediated Gene Correction for the HemoglobinopathiesR01HL135607 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PORTEUS, MATTHEW H · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of CRISPR has allowed site-specific genomic modification to become a reality and this technology is now being applied in a number of human clinical trials. While this technology has demonstrated impressive efficacy in the clinic to date, there remains the potential for unintended on- and off-target effects of CRISPR nuclease activity. A variety of

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9Gene therapygenome editingin vivo deliverynext-generating sequencingoff-target activity

Identifiers

PMID36439866
PMCPMC9685173
OpenAlexW4308869998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.