ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Genotype-phenotype correlations within the
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-quality genome assemblies of 64 Geodermatophilaceae strains isolated from desert soils in Xinjiang, China.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Change of the active bacteria mediating HCOiScience · 2026Article
- Taxonomic description of a novel genus,International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Trujillonella humicola sp. nov., a siderophore-synthesizing bacterium isolated from black soil in Northeast China.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Ecogenomic insights into the resilience of keystone Blastococcus Species in extreme environments: a comprehensive analysis.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Article
- Biotechnological and pharmaceutical potential of twenty-eight novel type strains ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of genomic information into microbial systematics along with physiological and chemotaxonomic parameters provides for a reliable classification of prokaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.