Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36439778›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Effects of

Charles Wang Wai Ng, Wen Hui Yan, Karl Wah Keung Tsim, Pui San So, Yi Teng Xia, Chun Ting To

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the potential of zinc-solubilizingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Ecological effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles Wang Wai NgDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wen Hui YanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Karl Wah Keung TsimDivision of Life Science and Centre for Chinese Medicine, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Pui San SoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yi Teng XiaDivision of Life Science and Centre for Chinese Medicine, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chun Ting ToDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of soil beneficial bacteria (SBB) in agriculture is steadily increasing as it provides a promising way to replace chemical fertilisers and other supplements. Although the role of SBB as a biofertiliser is well understood, little is known about the response of soil physiochemical properties via the change in soil enzymatic activities with SBB growth. In this study, sterilised bulk soil was inoculated with

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisPseudomonas fluorescensSoil beneficial bacteriaSoil fertilitySoil urease

Identifiers

PMID36439778
PMCPMC9691937
OpenAlexW4309778004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.