Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36439684›Full record

ArticleQuality & quantity2022

Looking for patterns of change amid pandemic period in students' evaluation of academic teaching.

Annalina Sarra, Adelia Evangelista, Barbara Iannone, Tonio Di Battista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality & quantity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annalina SarraDepartment of Philosophical, Pedagogical and Economic-Quantitative Sciences, University "G.d'Annunzio", Viale Pindaro, 42, Pescara, 65122 Italy.
Adelia EvangelistaDepartment of Philosophical, Pedagogical and Economic-Quantitative Sciences, University "G.d'Annunzio", Viale Pindaro, 42, Pescara, 65122 Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7596-9719
Barbara IannoneDepartment of Philosophical, Pedagogical and Economic-Quantitative Sciences, University "G.d'Annunzio", Viale Pindaro, 42, Pescara, 65122 Italy.
Tonio Di BattistaDepartment of Philosophical, Pedagogical and Economic-Quantitative Sciences, University "G.d'Annunzio", Viale Pindaro, 42, Pescara, 65122 Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has shaken not only the global economy but every development field, including all levels of the education sector and in every place in the world. The wide spread of this pandemic disaster has undoubtedly changed the education landscape worldwide. Online teaching and learning become the primary instruction method and the global world of schools, colleges and universities were forced to adapt this model. The first concern about online learning is whether this method is effective compared to traditional face-to-face lessons. In this paper, we carried out a quantitative analysis to explore variations in university students' feedback on learning experience in the context of this new challenging situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. By adopting an IRT modeling, we compared the appreciation of some aspects of 41 courses taught at the University of Chieti-Pescara (Italy) during the educational emergency with that of the previous year. Overall, from the results of this study, it is arisen that students have given positive feedbacks on their learning experiences and their effectiveness.

Indexed as

Higher educationIRTLearning satisfaction dataLinear logistic models with relaxed assumptionsOnline learning

Identifiers

PMID36439684
PMCPMC9676782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.