ArticleCureus2022
Using a Visual Turing Test to Evaluate the Realism of Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-Based Synthesized Myocardial Perfusion Images.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing an artificial intelligence-based progressive growing GAN for high-quality facial profile generation and evaluation through turing test and aesthetic analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Visual Turing test is not sufficient to evaluate the performance of medical generative models.European radiology experimental · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the quality of image generation by deep learning increases, it is becoming difficult to discern its authenticity from the image alone. Currently, generative models represented by generative adversarial networks (GAN) are increasingly utilized in the research field of cardiology, and their potential risks are also being pointed out. In this context, we assessed whether expert cardiologists can detect synthesized myocardial perfusion images (MPI) generated by GAN as fake. A total of 1448 polar maps collected from consecutive patients who underwent MPI for known or suspected coronary artery disease from January 2020 to December 2021 were used for the analysis. A deep convolutional GAN was trained on the polar maps to synthesize realistic MPI. The realism of the generated images in terms of human perception was evaluated by the visual Turing test (VTT) on our original website. The average correct answer rate of the VTT was only 61.1% with a standard deviation of 21.5, but this improved to 80.0±15.8 (%) in the second trial when given the clue information. In the era of machine intelligence and virtual reality, digital literacy is becoming more necessary for healthcare professionals to identify deepfakes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.