ReviewCureus2022
Effectiveness of Telemedicine for the Management of Foot Ulcers in People With Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Telemedical treatment of diabetic foot ulcer in rural and remote areas: a prospective single centre randomised controlled clinical trial.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of diabetes-related foot ulcers presents great pressure on the healthcare system in terms of management strategy and allocation of resources. Telemedicine can be used to treat diabetic foot ulcers more effectively. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impacts of telemedicine on the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The current meta-analysis was conducted as per the reported guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Two reviewers independently searched for relevant articles using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to 31 August 2022, assessing the impacts of telemedicine on the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The primary outcomes assessed in the current meta-analysis included the percentage of foot ulcers healed and the time of healing foot ulcers within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of amputation (minor and major) and all-cause mortality. A total of six studies were included in the current meta-analysis enrolling 1876 patients with diabetic foot ulcers. No difference was there between the two groups in terms of the number of patients whose ulcer healed (risk ratio (RR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-1.09), time to healing of wound within 12 months (mean difference: -0.07, 95% CI: -0.31-0.17), the incidence of amputation (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-1.00), and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.42-2.37). In conclusion, the study found that telemedicine is non-inferior to standard care in terms of reducing healing time and the number of patients with ulcer healing within 12 months. The study also found that the incidence of amputation is also lower in patients assigned to the telemedicine group compared to patients in the control group and no significant differences were reported in terms of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.