ArticleCureus2022
Outcomes of Epi-On Collagen Cross-Linkage Procedure Assessed in Progressive Keratoconus Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observation and assessment of the immediate use of a silicon hydrogel contact lens after transepithelial corneal cross linking: a prospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- The Critical Role of Oxygen Supplementation in Epithelium-On Corneal Cross-Linking: A Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Transepithelial corneal cross-linking: a review.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Epi-off riboflavin with vitamin E TPGS (Ribocross®) cross-linking: one-year outcome.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Quantifying choroidal and retinal thicknesses variations via optical coherence tomography in different stages of pediatric keratoconus.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKeratoconus is a corneal ectasia that causes astigmatism and reduced vision. Conventional treatment to stop the progression of ectasia involves debridement of corneal epithelium, followed by ultraviolet light and riboflavin drops to reinforce the collagen covalent bonds, called collagen cross-linkage (CXL). Epi-on (epithelium-on) is a modified technique without epithelial debridement and associated complications of pain, infection, and damage to the cornea. However, despite a good safety index and efficacy, Epi-on has not completely replaced the conventional Epi-off (epithelium-off) CXL. We aim to report our five-year experience and outcomes with Epi-on CXL Methods: In this five-year retrospective clinical audit, we included all patients who underwent Epi-on CXL from December 2014 to June 2020 at the Aga Khan University Hospital. Outcomes were based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and topographic indicators such as keratometry-max (K-max), keratometry mean (K-mean), pachymetry apex (Pach
resultsA total of 223 eyes of 134 patients had undergone CXL of which 32 eyes of 18 patients were included in the study based on the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 26.8 (+/- 6.137) years; nine were males and 16 were right eyes. Mean BCVA was 0.383 logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) units which improved to 0.292 units post CXL (p=0.02) and K-max decreased from 57.4 to 56.60 diopters (p=0.048), both outcomes were statistically significant. Pach
conclusionEpi-on CXL is an effective treatment for halting the progression of keratoconus. Our results showed significant improvement in visual acuity and K-max readings indicating a halting of the progression of keratoconus in our patients. Long-term follow-up is required for all patients to assess detailed outcomes. Further studies comparing Epi-on CXL with other methods may be carried out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.