Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36439524›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

The value of completion residual lung resection in ipsilateral recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.

Yong Yang, Yichao Wang, Ziwei Wan, Xiong Qin, Yuming Zhu, Bingyong Sheng, Xiaogang Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yong YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yichao WangDepartment of Oncology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ziwei WanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiong QinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuming ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Bingyong ShengDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaogang ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital · CNTongji University · CNYueyang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recurrence is one of the most important challenges to manage lung cancer. Selected patients might be candidates for resection. This study assessed the outcomes and hazard factors of patients after completion of lung resection for recurrence, focusing specifically on postrecurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival (OS) after surgery. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 63 patients who underwent complete pulmonary resection for recurrence between January 2015 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria include potentially curative first resection for primary lung cancer, histologically proven recurrent or new malignancy, and complete pathological report after both operations. PRS and OS were assessed and the influence of patient and treatment features on these endpoints was evaluated. Results: Most of the patients recurred at stage IIIA, and nearly three-fourth received complete pneumonectomy. The overall 2- and 5-year survival rates were 95% and 75%, whereas the overall 2- and 5-year postrecurrence survival rates were 55% and 36%, respectively. No patient died within 30 or 90 days after completion of residual lung resection, and no serious complications occurred during follow-up. Upon selection of clinically important variables by the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the r-stage [hazard ratio (HR), 3.35; 95% CI, 1.11-10.10; Conclusions: Complete pulmonary resection is an acceptable option in selected patients with recurrent lung cancer after surgery. The patients with r-stage earlier than IIIA may benefit from completion pulmonary resection but not IIIB. Completion pneumonectomy failed to significantly prolong the OS. The OS in the enrolled cases was mainly affected by the p-TNM stage assessed by the first resection for primary lung cancer.

Indexed as

completion pulmonary resectionlung canceroutcomeoverall survivalpostrecurrence survivalrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36439524
PMCPMC9681891
OpenAlexW4308723138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.