Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36439519›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Microfluidic vascular models of tumor cell extravasation.

Seunggyu Kim, Zhengpeng Wan, Jessie S Jeon, Roger D Kamm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Microengineered Platforms for Skin Research.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Modeling of spatiotemporal dynamics of ligand-coated particle flow in targeted drug delivery processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seunggyu KimMechanobiology Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Zhengpeng WanMechanobiology Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jessie S JeonBiomicrofluidics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.
Roger D KammMechanobiology Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Funding

Studying E-cadherin dynamics during extravasation and metastatic colonizationU54CA261694 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ROGER D KAMM, Vivek Shenoy · 2021 to 2026
$9.1M
Development of Physiologic Tissue Models to Assess Tumor Explant Response to Immune Checkpoint BlockadeU01CA214381 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BARBIE, DAVID A, KAMM, ROGER D · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214381NCI NIH HHS U54 CA261694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging microfluidic disease models have amply demonstrated their value in many fields of cancer research. These

Indexed as

cancer extravasationin vitro vascular modelmicrofluidic chippreclinical disease modelpre-metastatic microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36439519
PMCPMC9698448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.